1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Should it be a crime to not give a child modern medicine?

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by Techno Kid, Jul 31, 2013.

  1. Techno Kid

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2013
    Messages:
    1,635
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southeastern Ontario, Canada, Earth
    What I mean is if a parent of a child with a serious life threatening condition treats it with prayer, new age/alternative medicine, etc. If the case if that as a result of these "non traditional treatments" the child (under 18) dies then I think the parents should be tried for 2nd degree murder or at the very least neglect.

    I'm going to be honest, I don't care if this goes against a person's culture or religion...the child should come first.

    Now I know this is a controversial topic, but let's keep things civil.

    Thanks
     
  2. Hexagon

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Messages:
    8,558
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Earth
    Yeah. A child is not the property of their parents. They are human beings with the right to a life and a future.
     
  3. Rakkaus

    Rakkaus Guest

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2012
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    New York
    Yes, the child should be taken away from them.

    I'm sick of all the "parental rights" bullshit. Children are not the property of their parents, they're human beings entitled to equal protection under the law, and that includes protection from harm done to them with parental consent.

    So parents should not be allowed to deny children vital medical care. (For the same reason it should be illegal to perform a circumcision on a child, but that's another problem caused by this "parental rights" bullshit)
     
    #3 Rakkaus, Jul 31, 2013
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2013
  4. That1Guy

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2012
    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    United States
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Some people
    If the child is in need of medical care/medicine and the parent knows this, then yes, it should be considered child endangerment if the parent refuses to care for their child and instead use "prayer". If the parent is incapable of caring for the child then they should be taken away because they're obviously unfit to be parents and look after the childs health.
     
  5. Aussie792

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2013
    Messages:
    3,317
    Likes Received:
    62
    Location:
    Australia
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    A parent is a temporary guardian of a child. The point being that they cannot permanently deprive a child of life, no matter what their beliefs are. When you can prevent innocent death, it is tantamount to murder to let them die.
     
  6. LinkLarkin

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    England
    Yes, it should absolutely be a crime. In fact, people like that should not be allowed to reproduce in the first place.
     
  7. Randy

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2012
    Messages:
    3,784
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Texas
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Some people
    Enough said. It's sad how we (the US) tend to ignore one of the documents that our nation was founded upon.
     
  8. justjade

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2013
    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    North Canton, Ohio, US
    I do think kids should be given medical care, regardless of whether or not the parents think it's right. I understand the right to freedom of religion in the US and the freedom to practice their religion, but prayer is not medicine. As far as New Age or holistic medicine, that can also be practiced along side whatever treatment the child needs. Spells, prayer, and nutritional or chelation therapy are all fine, but they should not be used alone.

    If the parents don't allow their child(ren) treatment, they should have their child taken away.
     
  9. Pret Allez

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    6,785
    Likes Received:
    67
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Gender:
    Female (trans*)
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Some people
    Yes, obviously. Why is it even a question?
     
  10. Techno Kid

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2013
    Messages:
    1,635
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southeastern Ontario, Canada, Earth
    It seems like some people feel that their beliefs are more important than the child's rights. :/
     
  11. Hexagon

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Messages:
    8,558
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Earth
    This doesn't seem to be as controversial as you anticipated.
     
  12. Techno Kid

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2013
    Messages:
    1,635
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southeastern Ontario, Canada, Earth
    Yeah, I'm very pleased! :icon_bigg
     
  13. Hexagon

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Messages:
    8,558
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Earth
    :slight_smile: Occasionally, its nice to be agreed with.
     
  14. Pret Allez

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    6,785
    Likes Received:
    67
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Gender:
    Female (trans*)
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Some people
    Having very recently been a child, I'm quite skeptical about parental rights.
     
  15. Hexagon

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Messages:
    8,558
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Earth
    Yeah. Parents don't always (or even usually) know best. Personally, I don't think my parents should have had ANY rights.
     
  16. Techno Kid

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2013
    Messages:
    1,635
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southeastern Ontario, Canada, Earth
    Hehe yup :eusa_danc
     
  17. Owen

    In Loving Memory Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    613
    Likes Received:
    13
    Location:
    Massachusetts, USA
    What zhe said.
     
  18. unknown17050

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Messages:
    464
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sexual Orientation:
    Straight but curious
    I'm honestly surprised that there are people who don't.
     
  19. Techno Kid

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2013
    Messages:
    1,635
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southeastern Ontario, Canada, Earth
    Same with parents teaching sex ed to their kids (should be done by someone who knows the facts).
     
  20. Hexagon

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Messages:
    8,558
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Earth
    I sometimes wonder if there should be less focus in general on the biological parents. Let the kids be raised as part of a community or whatever. Because when there are just one or two people raising the kids, the pass on all of their prejudice and insecurities to their kids, and they're a very limited role model. What ever the parents are becomes the norm, and anything else is weird/different/wrong.