Taken from itspronouncedmetrosexual.com Thoughts? ---------- Post added 11th Feb 2014 at 04:00 PM ---------- In my opinion, honestly, let's just say we have guy parts or girl parts and leave the rest down to the simple fact that your genitals are not connected to your brain. That would be weird.
I think there's a mistake when it talks about "Gender expression". Androgyny are so wide that I think it's too hasty illustrating it as a "fifty-fifty". And I don't understand what means "hyper-masculine"
I feel like that a *lot*. There are soooo many terms that mean so many different things (there was a time when no one really knew terms besides gay/straight/lesbian...), and even still there's no way to cover *every* possibility. Get rid of all the labels and just be whoever it is that you are.
I like it, of course I think its a lot more complex then this. But for people who cant fathom to understand the LGBT community or gender identity this is a great place to start kinda like reading children's books when your learning a new language before you can read a or understand a novel in another language.
Personally, I think it's a good idea, it might need a little bit of tweaking. Any way: I think I understand it seeing as I am Gender-fluid. We have a physical sex.(Which can be reassigned.) We have our Gender Identity which is not always reflected in how we look, it gets a bit more complex for non-binary gendered persons. We have our Orientation which is who we are attracted to and for what reasons. Though then it gets even more complex and their are fetishes, and other things that drive us too. In fact femininity and masculinity are not always indicators of a person being non-straight, or non-genderqueer. I know a straight friend who gives off a very feminine vibe, but he is as straight as can be. It's more complex than a black and white binary classification, at least in my opinion.