1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

How The Media Misrepresents And Demonizes Black People

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by ZenMusic, Jun 3, 2015.

  1. ZenMusic

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2013
    Messages:
    1,015
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Middelsbrough, United Kingdom
    Gender:
    Male
    So I've been thinking, and it seems that a lot of the ignorance African-Americans get is due to how the media portrays them. The media gobble up stories of black on black crime, over-report them Slanted News Coverage Of Blacks Perpetuates Stereotypes | MadameNoire while stories about, say, victims of police brutality who are women of colour fall by the wayside. There are two things concerning this I want to put to bed :

    "Black people are bad because black on black crime"
    Not only is black on black crime at it's lowest point right nowhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/07/15/the-trayvon-martin-killing-and-the-myth-of-black-on-black-crime.html The Myth of the Black-on-Black Crime Epidemic | Demos, crime is related to two things, race and neighbourhood. Since people of the same race tend to live together, they are more likely to commit crimes against each other. However, black people do not kill a disproportionate amount of other black people. In fact, white on white crime is on the rise, but no one wants to talk about that because it doesn't fit the "black people are violent criminals" media narrative http://www.blackyouthproject.com/20...t_goes_against_the_false_media_narrative.html. So, black on black crime is BS

    "Well if we respected ourselves"
    It doesn't matter if we respect ourselves, it all comes down to the colour of our skin. The media always tries to make ridiculous justifications for the murderer's actions or dehumanizes the victim.
    "He's been in trouble with the police"
    "He was suspended from school"
    "He smoked weed"
    Some of these kids were honor roll students and they were still murdered because they were black.

    I feel thst once the media stops perpetuating this idea that black people are animals snd violent criminals, people will stop being so scared of us and that will be a huge weight lifted off our shoulders. What do you think?
     
  2. Christiaan

    Christiaan Guest

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    745
    Likes Received:
    1
    "By giving us the opinions of the uneducated, journalism keeps us in touch with the ignorance of the community." - Oscar Wilde

    I trust journalists less than I trust politicians, and they are considerably less likely to develop a conscience. They make money off of violence and divisiveness, so they have no vested interest in preventing it. Yellow journalism is the only kind of journalism remaining to us. Watching most broadcast news actually makes you less informed.

    Asking them to help stop racially motivated violence is like asking them to cook the goose that lays the golden eggs. They ain't going to do it. The problem is not that they don't know better. The problem is that they are actually evil.
     
  3. Austin

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2008
    Messages:
    3,172
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    ^Or maybe it's the consumers that demand that type of content who are evil. :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes: They're only giving the people what they want..
     
  4. kageshiro

    kageshiro Guest

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2012
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    in your soul
    People who dont think about what they hear on the news arent worth talking to anyway.
     
  5. Gen

    Gen
    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2012
    Messages:
    4,070
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Nowhere
    The media, however, creates demand.

    When it comes to politics and social issues, the media sets the agenda. This means that they significantly influence the way that the general public views certain issues and whether most citizens consider them at all based on the information that they share.

    For instance, politicians are constantly releasing budgets and proposals, but most of these documents are extremely long and dense. Thus, reporters are never able to discuss entire budgets or proposals. Regardless of whether they are bent on manipulating the public or not, they are forced to choose which topic within the proposal they want to share to the public. Their decisions influence how the nation views that specific proposal from that point forward.

    Reporters are not entertainers. They are educators. Clearly, they are going to seek to address the subjects that they believe will interest the people, but they do not work to "tell the people what they want to hear". If the people already new everything they needed or wanted to know about the subject, then they wouldn't tune in. Reporters don't cater to the views of the public; they create the view.
     
  6. Austin

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2008
    Messages:
    3,172
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Exacty my point.
     
  7. Gen

    Gen
    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2012
    Messages:
    4,070
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Nowhere
    That is not even my completely sentence...

    Anyway, the underlining point is that lack of attention being directed at certain topics within the media is one thing, but the inaccurate or incomplete portrayal of the topics that are addressed has much more harmful effects.
     
  8. Austin

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2008
    Messages:
    3,172
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    The point is, at the very least, it's a two way street. The media influences us, but we also influence the media.