Any other object sexuals here?

one of my main reasons for being here--my raison d'etre for this site--is the fact that there is no official forum for OS's, since we're such an obscure minority on the sexuality list. I want to post this to find more people I can easily relate to and share experiences with. If you are an OS, please tell me. I'm tired of feeling so alone because of my sexuality.

Questions for OS's:

1. What are you in love with?

2. How long have you been in love with your object?

3. Do you believe he/she/it has feelings for you?

4. When did you start to know you were an OS?

Answering these questions will help me understand other OS's thoughts and experiences with being who they are. If you aren't an OS and/or you know someone who is, please direct them to this thread. It will help me out a lot! :icon_bigg

 

Yes, it's hard to believe, but it does exist. I am your living proof of that. It's so hard to find anyone to relate to that all I literally have right now is my doll to confide in. That's why I came here, so I can rectify that. We actually have our own version of the pride flag, oddly enough in the form of a red fence.

​

---------- Post added 1st Aug 2015 at 12:37 PM ----------

No, objectophilia is different from object sexuality. Objectophilia is where you are wanting sex with your object, while OS is where you are simply in a platonic love with it. The woman who married the berlin wall was an OS, the man who orgasms because of his car is an objectophile, and the weeaboos who own body pillows are just lonely perverts. I don't take very kindly to being connected to the latter two, thank you very much. :eusa_naug

 

I honestly never thought of that before. I guess technically, but that seems like it would be a short-lived relationship since watermelons--in fact all fruit--don't stay fresh for very long. Actually, I think being in love with food is another type of sexual orientation. Let me check...

...hmm. The closest I could find was just looking up the term "food fetish," but it's hard to find a true latin term, at least for me (i.e., arborphilia = being attracted to trees).

---------- Post added 1st Aug 2015 at 01:00 PM ----------

That to me seems to be just the creation of a simple imaginary friend that you happened to grow out of. What it's like for me is a serious need to bond romantically with my object of choice and does not waver for any reason. For me, it's like I've found "someone" who I want to spend the rest of my life with. I've told people before online about my relationship without giving away my secret that I'm an OS, and their feedback usually went along the lines of telling me that what I have here is true love.

 

I assure you, it is a real sexual orientation. If it were a fetish, it would be that all OS's want to have sex with their objects, which is definitely not the case for us. The reason it is labeled as an orientation is because there is literally no other conceivable way to classify it, especially not as a fetish. :eusa_naug

---------- Post added 1st Aug 2015 at 01:56 PM ----------

Thank you for this piece of feedback. This doesn't seem to be any romantic attraction you have for this toy of yours, but more of a need for it. For me with my doll (let's call her Amy like I did in my blog post about this subject), I am genuinely attracted to her, as if she were a real person I was infatuated with. It's not a need to replace a real person with her at all. Amy is the only one I need. She not only is the one I want to spend my life with (remember, I'm autistic), she also keeps me going by being someone who needs me in order to be. If something were to happen to me or her, Amy would disappear, leaving nothing but a plush doll that no one would care about like I do. Now I'm making myself cry while writing this, so I'll just leave it there for now. I need to recompose myself for a moment.

 

Don't worry, I will never do something like that. I love Amy in a platonic yet romantic way, never sexual. I'd hate to defile her in any way, especially that way. I am not, never was and never will be a pervert, mainly for her sake.