1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Feminism: POVs

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by TheOneCactus, Apr 5, 2017.

  1. TheOneCactus

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2017
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Luxembourg City, Luxembourg
    Gender:
    Female (trans*)
    Gender Pronoun:
    They
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    A few people
    Before anyone attacks me, I belive that equality is extremely important in today's society and it is a essential human right and I totally belive that women should have equal rights/pay/job opportunities as men.
    However, femenists, who are fighting for womans rights, have got many flaws. namely them (or at least the ones i've seen on youtube) portraying men as mysoginistic and being wife beaters and sexual molesters. Some even go as far to say that all of us will or have raped women. They also use facts which can be biased or incorrect and often dont take into thought about the varients of men and women having say, different jobs and lifestyles. Overall, what they are doing is morally correct but the way they exerscise it is flawed, leading them to sometimes be agressive or even nazi-like (take the Hugh Mungus incident). I am not speaking for all feminist however as I have met many factually correct and to the point femenists who I think should represeant their entire community. I was wondering if I could get your opinion and please remeber that this is just my opinion
     
  2. PatrickUK

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2014
    Messages:
    6,943
    Likes Received:
    2,362
    Location:
    England
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    When it comes to issues like feminism we need to be careful not to generalise. I have heard feminists described in the most appalling terms and it only serves to perpetuate ill feeling and suspicion. In actual fact, it's precisely because of this that some feminists move to more radical positions. We must always pause to ask ourselves why anyone takes up a radical or extreme position on any issue, including feminism. Is it because moderation has achieved nothing (from their perspective)?
     
  3. Aussie792

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2013
    Messages:
    3,317
    Likes Received:
    62
    Location:
    Australia
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Before I properly respond, I just want to say I think you should be much more careful about how you characterise people you disagree with. Because if you don't engage accurately, you're not really engaging meaningfully at all. That creates anger and means you don't know where that response is coming from.

    First, even in the worst case you present, you mustn't interpret click-bait youtube feminism as characteristic of the whole movement.

    Second, I think what you're describing is a lot of women saying enough men commit enough offences to be scared and that enough men fail to respond to cultural trends which excuse sexual assault and other gender-based violence that it is a men's problem.

    It'd be really helpful if you could give some examples of what you're referring to.

    I'm going to take a leap and guess this is about the gender wage gap. The most important thing here to note is that most academic feminists do not claim that you will find clear examples of men and women in the exact same job receiving different pay.

    What you will find backed by overwhelming statistical evidence is that women, as the primary caregivers in most families, are individually poorer because of the hindrance that creates for progressing through a workplace. That sacrifices like staying at home for months or years hit women hardest after divorce because the financial sacrifice they bear for their family is often not compensated if they end up on their own. That traditionally female jobs are paid less despite not being justified as less valuable forms of labour (say, a handyman compared to a cleaner), that women are structurally and culturally prevented from reaching senior levels, that high-paying professions often have toxic and sexist cultures that discourage women from staying.

    That is much more complex and requires a lot of economic, sociological, political and family law theory to wrap your head around. A lot of people are likely to misunderstand the data surrounding feminist debates, regardless of their motive.

    I'm not aware of the Hugh Mungus incident but I really think you should take a deep breath before deciding that Nazism is the best example.

    Feminism isn't an organised body; even the word "movement" is a misnomer. Its adherents have vastly different views of the world, no means of coming to communal agreement and different beliefs about what principles and methods constitute feminism. When you deal with feminism, remember that no one person can be representative of the entire movement.
     
  4. Creativemind

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    Messages:
    3,281
    Likes Received:
    411
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Gender:
    Other
    Gender Pronoun:
    Other
    Sexual Orientation:
    Other
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    The LGBT community also has many flaws. Bisexuals telling gay people we're "shallow" and wrong for not dating the opposite sex. Gay men who are sexist against women and make lesbians/bi women feel unwelcome. Gay people who are biphobic and tell bi people they're just going through a phase. Gay/bi people who are transphobic and tell trans people they aren't the gender they are.

    Being too "accepting" in our community to the point we're including people that don't face any LGBT rights issues. Stereotyping. Gay men shitting on lesbians and telling us they have it worse than us, even though we still face misogyny. Gay people who call everyone "queer" without asking if the person is comfortable with the word. LGBT people turning the community into certain political beliefs that other LGBT people disagree with, making us feel unwelcome if we don't share those politics. LGBT people who act overly sexualized and make our community extremely sexual; making more sexually conservative gay people (and asexuals) feel unwelcome. Invalidation of identities.

    It goes on and on.

    The point is that no community is perfect. I support feminism for what it originally stood for. There are extremists that do what you say, but not all of them think that way. We still have a lot of misogyny in our culture we have to combat, and sometimes I feel more safe in feminist communities than LGBT ones because of that.

    Every group has extremists that hurt and say shitty things about other people. The LGBT community is no exception and no better than the "feminazis" I hear people complain about. Do some feminists hate men and say shit about them? Yes. Just like the LGBT says shit and hurts others in our OWN community.
     
    #4 Creativemind, Apr 5, 2017
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2017
  5. Chiroptera

    Admin Team Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2014
    Messages:
    2,505
    Likes Received:
    1,383
    Location:
    Brazil
    Gender:
    Male
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    We need to be careful about generalizations.

    Of course, feminism (as any other community) has many flaws, and the "SJW side" of the movement is really problematic. Furthermore, the lack of self-criticism also hurts the movement. For example, when a fanatic leader talks, it is really rare to see someone from the movement publicy disagreeing. They stand still like "oh, X is exaggerating, but our enemies are worst, so we need to ignore our flaws and stay strong". I disagree with that thinking, because i think self-criticism is essential to the sucess of a movement.

    For example, i have already spoken against the excess of labels in the LGBT community (i won't enter in details about this now, but i'm talking about labels that refer to a really small, tiny fluctuation on human sexuality, as i think it is unecessary to divide people like that). That doesn't mean i'm an "homophobe", or that i want to make people think our fight "isn't that serious". Of course we need to fight against bigots, against prejudice. But that doesn't mean we don't need to stop every now and then and think: "Hey, we know our objective is real and important, but are we really taking the best path to reach that objective, or do we need to sit down, talk between ourselves and adjust our methodology a little bit?". In a simple analogy, in a war, do you think it is best to discuss strategy and decide the best course of action, or just send a bunch of soldiers yelling, shooting and blaming everything, without a plan?

    But, there's the other side of coin. The main objective of the movement is perfectly valid, and there are people fighting for it. Women are oppressed. We need to be aware of that and do something about it, and a movement is necessary for that.

    On this other side of the coin, we have "anti-SJWs" fanatics. Those who are so tired of "SJW fanatics" that they end up labeling every and any person fighting for a cause a "fanatic". These are the people who think feminism is 100% evil and unfair, and they point fingers at you just by hearing the word "equality". "Oh, you fight for equality! You are a socialist, communist, feminist SJW! You are the problem in this world!".

    The world isn't all "black and white". There isn't a totally evil side and a totally good side. In feminism, there are extremists, and if you don't see that, maybe it is a good idea to rethink your own position. On the other hand, if you think every feminist is an extremist, and that the fight against prejudice isn't necessary, it is also a good idea to check our position.

    The fight for equality is important. Prejudice and violence are very real, regardless if we are talking about misogyny, racism, homophobia, etc. But, as in any fight, we can't just fight, fight, fight, without thinking.

    Paulo Freire, a famouse teacher from Brazil, alerted us about the necessary use of "praxis": Practice without theory becomes extremism, and theory without practice becomes empty "blabbering".

    What we need to seek in any movement is the "praxis": The balance between theory and practice. I believe that only through that balance can movements fight in a constructive way, rather than in a destructive one.