![]() | ![]() | ||||||
| |||||||
| Chit Chat General discussion of topics of interest to LGBT people of all ages. |
| View Poll Results: What form of constitutional reform would you support (if any) | |||
| A written (codified) constitution | | 2 | 10.53% |
| An elected President as head of state | | 1 | 5.26% |
| An elected President as head of state & government | | 0 | 0% |
| Reform for the entire legislature | | 2 | 10.53% |
| Reform to the house of commons only | | 6 | 31.58% |
| All of the above | | 4 | 21.05% |
| None of the above | | 4 | 21.05% |
| Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Member Regular Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: Best Friend Age: 23 Posts: 61 Join Date: Sep 2007 | Ok, dont know if this thread will garner any interest so here goes. Given the ongoing political crisis over MP's expenses how many people would like to see some constitutional reform. Given the inability of the queen to act, do you not think the head of state should be elected? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| A gay heteropolitan? Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Out Status: Enough for now Location: Oxford and Birmingham, UK Age: 20 Posts: 1,300 Join Date: Jul 2008 | am i right in thinking that the Queen technically can still act? Obs she still has to pass laws so she maintains that power,but am i right in thinking she can also technically disolve parliament. In the same way she opens it and the PM is invited to form a gov by her... i could be wrong i dunno...?
__________________ 'Im not your toy and this isn't another girl meets boy' |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Member Regular Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: Best Friend Age: 23 Posts: 61 Join Date: Sep 2007 | Quote:
Its explained here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...ame-duck-queen Personally i think we should go back to the drawing board, reduce the house of commons, elect the second chamber and have an elected president as head of state & government | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| EC Addict Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: All but family Location: London Age: 29 Posts: 712 Join Date: Aug 2008 | No you are right the queen does have the power to dissolve parliament or Gordon Brown can stand down and call a general election. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Member Regular Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: Best Friend Age: 23 Posts: 61 Join Date: Sep 2007 | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| A gay heteropolitan? Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Out Status: Enough for now Location: Oxford and Birmingham, UK Age: 20 Posts: 1,300 Join Date: Jul 2008 | okies thanks for clarifying what i thought ![]() Personally im not a fan of the house of lords,i would get rid of that.
__________________ 'Im not your toy and this isn't another girl meets boy' |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Member Regular Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: Best Friend Age: 23 Posts: 61 Join Date: Sep 2007 | yeh, me too. But as i said i really dont like the idea of the royal family lol. But i gather thats a rather unpopular opinion....go figure lol. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| EC's Geordie Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: bi/gay Out Status: Out to friends, family and anyone who wants to kno Location: Lancaster University Age: 22 Posts: 397 Join Date: Dec 2008 | the queen has the legal ability still to do pretty much what she wants with england, the problem is that she never would because then it would bring up the questions of why we still have a monarch and why we pay lots of money for her to live in luxury, personally i don't want there to be fundamental change because i like having a queen, and i think the queen also brings in a lot of tourism, i also can't see how we could effect change unless we went down a revolutionary road and forced it.
__________________ "Life happens without warning" |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Member Regular Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: Best Friend Age: 23 Posts: 61 Join Date: Sep 2007 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| A gay heteropolitan? Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Out Status: Enough for now Location: Oxford and Birmingham, UK Age: 20 Posts: 1,300 Join Date: Jul 2008 | I don't mind the Royal Family i guess,as long as they keep their noses out of directly getting involved in politics lol. Tbh what im less a fan of is how Brown is pm without winning an election!
__________________ 'Im not your toy and this isn't another girl meets boy' |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Member Regular Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: Best Friend Age: 23 Posts: 61 Join Date: Sep 2007 | Yeah id like to see that change, then we wouldnt get clowns like gordon brown in office lol |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| A gay heteropolitan? Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Out Status: Enough for now Location: Oxford and Birmingham, UK Age: 20 Posts: 1,300 Join Date: Jul 2008 | Quote:
ive had knocks on our door from all 3 major parties ![]()
__________________ 'Im not your toy and this isn't another girl meets boy' | |
| | |
| | #13 | ||
| Member Regular Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: Best Friend Age: 23 Posts: 61 Join Date: Sep 2007 | Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #14 |
| EC's Geordie Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: bi/gay Out Status: Out to friends, family and anyone who wants to kno Location: Lancaster University Age: 22 Posts: 397 Join Date: Dec 2008 | At uni the only political pressure we're under is to "make your vote anti-facist" and thats about it, though eddie izzard is coming to talk to us labour suppporters which should be fun, though even i now struggle to defend gormless brown
__________________ "Life happens without warning" |
| | |
| | #15 |
| A gay heteropolitan? Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Out Status: Enough for now Location: Oxford and Birmingham, UK Age: 20 Posts: 1,300 Join Date: Jul 2008 | my constituancy is labour. but the lib dems and conservatives both seem to be making a big move on it,coz its one that floats about between parties. Most of Oxford is lib dem,with the countryside around it conservative. But yes ive spoken to my candidates from all the parties and had endless busniness cards and leaflets hehe
__________________ 'Im not your toy and this isn't another girl meets boy' |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Member Regular Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: Best Friend Age: 23 Posts: 61 Join Date: Sep 2007 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #17 | ||
| A gay heteropolitan? Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Out Status: Enough for now Location: Oxford and Birmingham, UK Age: 20 Posts: 1,300 Join Date: Jul 2008 | Quote:
__________________ 'Im not your toy and this isn't another girl meets boy' | ||
| | |
| | #18 | |||
| Member Regular Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: Best Friend Age: 23 Posts: 61 Join Date: Sep 2007 | Quote:
Labour say they'll look at giveing him treatment The conservatives say why bother And the lib dems say lets put a plaster on it while we look at the other issues lol | |||
| | |
| | #19 | ||||
| A gay heteropolitan? Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Out Status: Enough for now Location: Oxford and Birmingham, UK Age: 20 Posts: 1,300 Join Date: Jul 2008 | Quote:
__________________ 'Im not your toy and this isn't another girl meets boy' | ||||
| | |
| | #20 |
| Guest Posts: n/a | Do you really think changing the system to a Federal one would make a blind bit of difference or make politicians any more honest? Believe me it wouldn't, the problem isn't so much the system as a whole, though it could do with a few tweaks here and there, it has more to do with changes that have been made to "modernise" a way of government that worked perfectly well such as the imbalance of power between the Houses and the fact that instead of being a counterpoint to the commons, the house of lords has been crippled by the removal of life peers to be replaced by boot licking party appointed peers. As for the royal family the amount that the tax payer spends on their upkeep is minimal now days, the queen and p.o.w etc. , are wealthy in their own right due to shrewd investment and other such things and pay most of there own expenses. The rumour that they are a drain on the taxpayer is nonsense spread by anti-monarchy newspapers and the like. The good they do with charity work and just as ambassadors for britain (and it is britain you're talking about NOT just england :-) ) far outweighs the small expense. I agree with you that tings must be looked at and changes must be made but changing to a Federal system is not the way forward, look at Berlesconi and the French president before this one, both corrupt as you like! It's no better and in many ways worse than our constitutional monarchy. Rant over :-) Sorry i'm something of a Royallist... |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Banana Republic and Express fans | pianomike | Entertainment and Media | 8 | 20th Oct 2008 06:53 PM |
| Monarchy? Republic? | Bevo | Chit Chat | 29 | 19th Apr 2008 01:16 AM |