![]() | ![]() | ||||||
| |||||||
| Chit Chat General discussion of topics of interest to LGBT people of all ages. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| EC Addict Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Location: Toronto, Canada Age: 22 Posts: 668 Join Date: Nov 2006 | Hey all, Bryan needs the help of EC. I have stumbled upon a question that I need a variety of perspectives on. The question is simple: "Why should people be ethical?" Application: "Suppose the world comes to a Dystopia, and everybody is living in poverty, governments fall apart, society crumbles. There is one man with lots of food and resources but he is unwilling to share to the general public unless it benefits him. How would you convince him to be ethical and share it with the public even if it does not benefit him?" Thank you for your participation!
__________________ ![]() "But only in their dreams can man be truly free. 'Twas always thus, and always thus will be." - John Keating, Dead Poets Society |
| | |
| | #2 |
| EC Addict Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: Out to everyone Location: Irvine, CA Age: 25 Posts: 320 Join Date: Oct 2009 | As far as convincing him, he's unwilling to share unless it benefits him. So, you have to give him something of use or desire to him. Maybe material, maybe services, whatever he wants, I guess. Keep in mind, if he's being so unethical, the option does exist for everyone to also be unethical. So, the general public could kill this man and take his food and resources. That wouldn't be ethical either, so I don't know if that fits into the restrictions of your question. Good question. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Was Invisible. EC Moderator ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: Out to everyone Age: 20 Posts: 3,704 Join Date: Jul 2008 | Being humanitarian changes its normal meaning when the survival of everybody depends on one thing. People need food and resources. If this actually happened then I'm pretty sure someone would act in the intentions of the masses and take the power away from this guy, whether it's in death or not, and redistribute the food and resources more evenly. If you're talking about a less simplified imbalance of wealth and power far past the imbalance we have today, then I do think people would turn towards social revolution and the masses would expropriate the rich. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Perpetually Bored! Regular Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: Some people Age: 21 Posts: 732 Join Date: Jan 2010 | Your question itself is unethical. You want a different answer to a different question.....!!!! In general, the definition of ethics changes from person to person. I think its the circumstance in life that defines your move as moralistic .You have to be unethical sometimes and still do good to the people around you. Ya.. I just read Shantaram !
__________________ The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone to blame it on. - Robert Bloch |
| | |
| | #5 |
| A gay heteropolitan? Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Out Status: Enough for now Location: Oxford and Birmingham, UK Age: 20 Posts: 1,300 Join Date: Jul 2008 | i think it would be pretty difficult to give him a reason why he should share his stuff, other than those like 'you should do so' or 'its the right thing to do' But ultimately surely that's what ethics are. They aren't a weighing up of what i get from this situation, its your instinctive feeling as to what is right and what is wrong. In this situation i believe the majority of people wouldn't need to be convinced to share what they have. I feel most people would instinctively know that it is the right thing to do, and thus would share. Or do i have too much of a naive view of people? ![]()
__________________ 'Im not your toy and this isn't another girl meets boy' |
| | |
| | #6 | ||||
| EC Addict Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Location: Toronto, Canada Age: 22 Posts: 668 Join Date: Nov 2006 | Yeah.. the entire thing surrounds the notion of "ethics". I'll respond to a few suggestions provided thus far. There is no such thing as a "wrong" suggestion; I am just responding with the prevalent theory of "ethics" from different schools. I do not have any credentials in ethics, so what I might be erroneous. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________ ![]() "But only in their dreams can man be truly free. 'Twas always thus, and always thus will be." - John Keating, Dead Poets Society | ||||
| | |
| | #7 | ||||
| Was Invisible. EC Moderator ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: Out to everyone Age: 20 Posts: 3,704 Join Date: Jul 2008 | Quote:
Quote:
I tend to be a tad nihilistic when it comes to moral boundaries… | ||||
| | |
| | #8 |
| Resident Gun owner Regular Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Bisexual Out Status: A few people Location: Chicago, IL Age: 27 Posts: 388 Join Date: Jul 2008 | it depends on the circumstances of the situation. if the guy busted his balls to get the food and properly store it, then i say he should be compensated for his hard work. Or if he busted his ass to get the food and store it but everyone around him was an asshole to him over the years or whatever then yeah he should be a dick about it. Now if it was my own personal survival and the survival of my family and friends, and I didn't know this guy at all I would just kill him and take it by force, i could care less about ethics and moral's when it comes to the survival of me and my family/friends (treat others, as you would want to be treated; if he's going to act like an asshole i'm going to treat him like one)
__________________ "God created people, but Samuel Colt made them equal" Vote Republican |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Call me Andy. Full Member Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Location: Texas Age: 18 Posts: 391 Join Date: Mar 2009 | Isn't ethics by definition, the distinction between what is right and wrong? So why should you be ethical? Because it's what's right, so it's what you, by definition, should do. As for the application, idk. You could try to bribe him (he may have food and resources, but you have the rest of the world and its people) but that would benefit him, so that's out. Guilt him I guess.
__________________ "Se brosser les dents, est au haut d'une échelle au bas de laquelle il y a: perdre son âme." - Les Misérables |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Flappychap Full Member ![]() Gender: Male Orientation: Gay Out Status: Out to everyone Location: Oregon, USA Age: 28 Posts: 5,591 Join Date: May 2008 | well, he if he hording all the food, he probably is fat, because he clearly has all the food anyone could need, and more so... so you kill him, cut him up, take his food, and have fatguy bbq. okay... grossness aside. ethics is a idea, not a fact. it only has power when everyone involved agrees to abide by it. as long as fatty mcFoodHorder refuses to consider that what he is doing is harmful, than there is little you can do but take it by force. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| RAWR DINOSAURS EC Chat Mod ![]() Gender: I make the small motile sex cells. Orientation: I like people who make small motile sex cells. Out Status: CHIRP CHIRP CHIRP Location: Indiana or New Mexico. Who knows? Age: 22 Posts: 895 Join Date: Dec 2008 | To be honest, there is no reason at all to be ethical. There is no reason to be ethical, its a personal choice. I like a quote of Aristotle's "I have gained this from philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law." If he doesn't accept ethics, there really isn't any argument you can make, because there is no logical reason to be ethical (except for perhaps, you'll feel better about yourself if you are...).
__________________ (Insert witty signature here) |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |