1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Revising LGBTQ

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by Munyal, Mar 21, 2013.

  1. Munyal

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2013
    Messages:
    530
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    Why isn't it LGBTAPQ instead of LGBTQ? The A stands for Agender/Asexual and the P stands for Pangender/Pansexual. Besides being longer, what are the problems of the (proposed by me) LGBTAPQ label?
     
  2. The Escapist

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,301
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kentucky, U.S.
    Gender:
    Female
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Other
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Nothing that the original doesn't have as far as I can see.
    I don't have big opinions on the matter myself, so go for it if you want. I generally just add a plus sign since somebody is always going to be left out. Sometimes I don't, and just go with the usual I guess.

    ---------- Post added 21st Mar 2013 at 09:35 PM ----------

    Well, actually, it doesn't "roll off the tongue" as easily as LGBTQ for me. But whatever.

    ---------- Post added 21st Mar 2013 at 09:36 PM ----------

    And I guess it isn't as "catchy" either. But again, whatever.
     
  3. Munyal

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2013
    Messages:
    530
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    This is true.
     
  4. Ettina

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2012
    Messages:
    1,508
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    Gender:
    Female
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Personally, I don't think we can ever cram in all the acronyms we'd need to include everybody. Can't we just take it as a given that all genders and sexualities are included?
     
  5. The Escapist

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,301
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kentucky, U.S.
    Gender:
    Female
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Other
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Yes, maybe it should be a given, but I have to admit I feel unsure if it is only "LGBT." Especially since we in the community don't always accept each other.
     
  6. Ettina

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2012
    Messages:
    1,508
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    Gender:
    Female
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Ironically, I've gotten more acceptance from LGBT people in general than from asexual-specific groups. Me being a nonlibidoist asexual who can't seem to get the concept of asexual romance (how is it any different from having a best friend?) has gotten me some bad reactions from other asexuals. Apparently just being myself means putting down less stereotypical asexuals. And being honest about not understanding something means I'm telling people how they should feel.
     
  7. The Escapist

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,301
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kentucky, U.S.
    Gender:
    Female
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Other
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    That sucks. Even from communities like AVEN? They seem to be quite accepting and loving of all different types of asexuals.
     
  8. Ettina

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2012
    Messages:
    1,508
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    Gender:
    Female
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    AVEN especially.
     
  9. The Escapist

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,301
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kentucky, U.S.
    Gender:
    Female
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Other
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Oh my god. I've went through their site and they seemed especially accepting of nonlibidoist asexual aromantics. Seriously? Wow.
     
  10. Romi

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2012
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    FL, USA
    See.....you're still leaving out intersex individuals. -_-
     
  11. BornInTexas

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2013
    Messages:
    1,543
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Louisiana
    I tried saying LGBTAPQ three times fast. It doesn't work. Whenever I am writing something about LGBT community, I put LGBT+, which stands for EVERYONE who is apart of the community. It is easier to write / say.
     
  12. Chip

    Board Member Admin Team Advisor Full Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Messages:
    16,560
    Likes Received:
    4,757
    Location:
    northern CA
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    There are various incarnations, one which actually took hold in some circles was LGBTQQIQ. Quite frankly, it's a little ridiculous to try and include every subcategory. I know that anyone who happens to be in some category that isn't directly named might feel left out, but at a certain point... it really doesn't (or shouldn't) matter. The solution some organizations have come up with is to simply call themselves the lambda alliance or the queer alliance or some such that's more inclusive.

    If we don't draw the line somewhere, it will end up being LGBTQNENBIDHSMGBDIEHTKD at some point. :wink:
     
  13. Naren

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    559
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Wanna see me? Buy a telescope.
    How about LGBTAPQEE?
    Lesbian, gay, bisexual/bigender, trans* umbrella, asexual/agender, pansexual/pangender, queer etc, and everyone else
     
  14. BornInTexas

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2013
    Messages:
    1,543
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Way too many letters. XD
     
  15. Pret Allez

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    6,785
    Likes Received:
    67
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Gender:
    Female (trans*)
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Some people
    I simply like queer. The alphabet soup idea needs to be put to rest.
     
  16. The Escapist

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,301
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kentucky, U.S.
    Gender:
    Female
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Other
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Heh heh, cute. :slight_smile:
     
  17. Ianthe

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,760
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Oregon
    OMG, please, can't we just say queer?

    I'm sorry, but I don't think I need a reason other than it being longer. It's already too long.

    I once saw a website where the abbreviation was literally ten letters long. And it was not a joke. They were totally serious. That is WAY out of hand.

    If we try to name out every possible variation THERE WILL ALWAYS BE MORE. Forever. No matter what.

    Also, in my experience, asexuals and intersex people are both pretty divided as to whether they think it is appropriate that they be included. In fact, some get very offended if they are associated with our community.
     
  18. BradThePug

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    6,573
    Likes Received:
    288
    Location:
    Ohio
    Gender:
    Male (trans*)
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Some people
    I'm personally a fan of GSM (gender and sexual minorities).
     
  19. Ridiculous

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Messages:
    3,583
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    New Zealand
    I think we should just say queer as well.
    Acronyms longer than about 4 letters don't work very well unless they can be pronounced as a word, e.g. laser.
     
  20. Oddish

    Oddish Guest

    I just say LGBT+/LGBTQ+, or queer.

    "+" as in everyone else under the wide gender and sexuality umbrella.