1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

LGBT News 3 States End Resistance to Spousal Benefits Order

Discussion in 'Current Events, World News, & LGBT News' started by HuskyPup, Dec 1, 2013.

  1. HuskyPup

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2013
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    An Igloo in Baltimore, Maryland
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    OK, here's some relatively good news!

    From the NYT: (NOV 27)

     
  2. Sarcastic Luck

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2013
    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    You mean Oklahoma actually did something intelligent for once?
     
  3. HuskyPup

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2013
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    An Igloo in Baltimore, Maryland
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    It would appear so!
     
  4. AwesomGaytheist

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2013
    Messages:
    6,909
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Gender:
    Genderqueer
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Texas actually did something that made sense? What a concept!
     
  5. starfish

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    3,368
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hippie Town, Alberta of the US
    Actually it kinda ticks me off how Texas is compiling with it. The federal government is providing, personal, equipment, and paying for space, to do the benefit processing.

    That way the state can say look, we are not providing same sex benefits, that is the federal government. That is just childish in my book, and a waste of money. There are already people and equipment for this stuff, so the state should just let them do their job.
     
  6. HuskyPup

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2013
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    An Igloo in Baltimore, Maryland
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    I think Texas would blame the federal government no matter what.

    Texas would probably blame the federal government if it was stuck by a giant meteor, besieged by swarms of locusts, or, if all of the sudden, swept away by a cataclysmic tidal wave. In Texas, it seems to me that almost everything is the fault of the federal government, especially when a Democrat is in the Whitehouse.

    I'm happy that they've made it easier for people to claim their benefits...after all, Texas does get hit by hurricanes, tornadoes and other natural disasters where the National Guard helps out, so why make it harder on the people who this kind of work?
     
    #6 HuskyPup, Dec 2, 2013
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2013