1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

LGBT News Indiana gay marriage ban one step closer

Discussion in 'Current Events, World News, & LGBT News' started by sldanlm, Jan 23, 2014.

  1. sldanlm

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2013
    Messages:
    1,322
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Eastern U.S.A. commuter
    Gender:
    Female
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Some people
  2. BradThePug

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    6,573
    Likes Received:
    288
    Location:
    Ohio
    Gender:
    Male (trans*)
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Some people
    2 steps forward, one step back. I'm sure that we'll see the day where these amendments are null and void. That could be in a few years, or a long way in the future though.
     
  3. Rakkaus

    Rakkaus Guest

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2012
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    New York
    Ugh, Republicans never give up.

    Indiana is one state where the anti-gay side could probably still win a statewide ballot measure. Even though I know nationwide marriage equality is an inevitability... I still hate the idea of the hatemongers getting to disrupt the overall forward-moving narrative and claim a 'victory' to fundraise off of.

    Though I guess I should be optimistic that in 2014, even Indiana could vote our way. Indiana is a Republican state, but it has a moderate streak, hence why they eagerly re-elected the relatively moderate Republican Richard Lugar to the Senate for decades, but when the Tea Party GOP primary voters dumped Lugar for a right-wing nutjob like Richard Mourdock, the state elected a Democrat to the Senate in 2012. Indiana even narrowly voted for Barack Obama in 2008, one of the most shocking election results ever.
     
  4. Cas

    Cas
    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2014
    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Indiana
    I live in Indiana and I wish that I could marry whomever I fall in love with here. But if the ban is supported (which it likely will be, considering this is a red state), then there will be no hope. I'm just upset by the whole debacle.
     
  5. SemiCharmedLife

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2013
    Messages:
    3,062
    Likes Received:
    85
    Location:
    KY
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Not that Kentucky's in any better shape but this makes me want to stand on my side of the Ohio River and throw things at them.
     
  6. andrew812

    andrew812 Guest

    I was in state senator Brent Steele law office Friday, and could not get the nerve to tell him not to support HJR-3. He was 2 feet away from me having a conversation with my grandfather. He will probably vote for it though, because he fought unsuccessfully to keep the ten commandments at the courthouse once.
     
  7. PurpleGrey

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2013
    Messages:
    825
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    LA county
    Jeez, Indiana! Get with the times if nothing else!

    But in all seriousness, you really gotta wonder where the logic is in banning same-sex marriage. Even on moral grounds, there are heaps of things that people consider morally wrong that are legal. Booze, tobacco, coffee, meat, killing unborn babies, spanking your children, hunting. More to the point, aren't republicans supposed to want the government to stay out of our business?
     
  8. GeeLee

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2013
    Messages:
    1,442
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Gender:
    Male
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Not out at all
    No, Republicans want the government to stay out of their business while they exercise the right to interfere in everyone else's.
     
  9. SomeNights

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2012
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Indiana
    anyone else watching the live webcast of the chamber?
     
  10. SimpleMan

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    Messages:
    414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Had to work my second job tonight, but I followed along via Facebook.

    Basically the second sentence was stripped from the proposed amendment. It now bans gay marriage, but does not ban the possibility of civil unions etc. It is all but assured that it will pass the full house tomorrow now that the second sentence has been dropped. It will then go to the senate where the second sentence could be reinstated. Highly unlikely as they have pledged to take up the bill as written from the house.

    The change in the wording effectively resets the amendment process if both chambers pass it. They would have to reintroduce the proposed amendment and pass it in the 2015 or 2016 general assembly in order for the referendum for the amendment to be put on the 2016 ballot. Though the governor is extremely conservative, he doesn't want a divisive social issue on the ballot when he is up for reelection in 2016. (He didn't even get 50% of the vote the first time around.)

    Some Republicans are still going to try to get it on the ballot for 2014 since they only "deleted" a sentence instead of adding anything. Their argument will be that it is the same amendment that was previously passed. Prior to the start of this session, they were told the chance of that plan holding up in the state courts is slim to none by their own legal experts.

    The state is already evenly divided on whether gay marriage should be legal. It is only going to lean further towards acceptance in the next two years. We will also hopefully have a Supreme Court ruling by that point. I don't want to count my chickens before they are hatched, but it is unlikely the ban could make it into the constitution at this point according to most legal experts.
     
    #10 SimpleMan, Jan 27, 2014
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2014
  11. Daydreamer1

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    5,680
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Gender:
    Male (trans*)
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Other
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    It's 2014. Indiana is a fucking embarassament to this country. I swear in 50 years when the ignorant bigots die off, they're going to look fucking stupid.