General News 23yr old woman poses as 15yr old to have sex with minors

Yea that does annoy me. The whole "lucky" thing.

 

She was clearly being deceitful, but it doesn't really constitute 'rape'. Statutory rape, yes, since the people in question are below the age of consent so cannot legally give their consent (even if they willingly engaged in sex). Pointless pedantry on my part though - since she is breaking the law whichever way you cut it.

I do agree with you about double-standards. If it was a 15 or 16 year old she was having sex with, I wouldn't bat an eye lid, but this person may well be a prepubescent, and if it was a man having sex with a female minor, there would be uproar - and rightly so. 13-year-olds hardly have the best judgement of character, either - too young and naive.

 

I hate the rape double standard. Rape is rape.

It shouldn't matter what the genders of the attacker or victim are. A male rape victim can feel just as violated as a female one. All the double standard does it imply that women are weaker than men, and deprive male rape victims of help. =/

 

WTH, woman!? EWWWWW. There's no way a 13 year old boy didn't look like a kid. Plus, she's specifically targeting little boys. Technically, it was statutory rape but regardless of the legal verbiage, an adult who is attracted to children is a pedophile, plain and simple. This woman should be locked up for life - or better, given to the parents of her victims.

If she's pregnant, she should be forced to have an abortion. I wish that there was a way to test for pedophile/ rapist brain chemistry and just eliminate such people before they ever harm anyone.

---------- Post added 12th May 2014 at 02:48 PM ----------

WTH, woman!? EWWWWW. There's no way a 13 year old boy didn't look like a kid. Plus, she's specifically targeting little boys. Technically, it was statutory rape but regardless of the legal verbiage, an adult who is attracted to children is a pedophile, plain and simple. This woman should be locked up for life - or better, given to the parents of her victims.

If she's pregnant, she should be forced to have an abortion. I wish that there was a way to test for pedophile/ rapist brain chemistry and just eliminate such people before they ever harm anyone.

 

..Yet some people have the urges but never act on them.

 

There is no question she did wrong. She knowingly mislead a 13 year old into having sex with her. Rape, statutory rape, I don't care what you call it, she needs to go away.

This argument could be used by homophobes against the LGBT community. Just change out "pedophile/rapist" with "LGBT." Not all pedophiles act on their urges. It is the act of molesting/raping a child that is wrong, as a child can't consent.

 

When I comes to sex children and rape are the worst

 

This outrages me. So, you have an adult woman here lying about her age and manipulating a thirteen year old boy into sex. She has also admitted to manipulating another boy into sex as well, and police believe that there could be others. She's allegedly pregnant and has probably given the boy an STI.

I don't know if it's possible, but if she's pregnant they should force her to have an abortion. Hopefully, the STI is something treatable, and nothing serious.

This woman belongs in prison, where she should remain for the rest of her life, as she is a serial predator.

 

Not sure I like the idea of forced abortion because the mother allegedly did wrong. I think that opens the door to a whole load of unintended possibilities.

EDIT: I've got no problem with social services taking the kid off her though.

 

Oh, don't get me wrong. I feel squeamish about the idea as well. It's just that I hate the idea of a thirteen year old boy essentially being forced to be a father, or being put in a position where he knows he has a kid out there somewhere but doesn't know who or where that kid is... just imagine growing up and living your life knowing that you have a kid out there, but you can't find them. To me, that's worse than the rape.

The only alternative is that the kid be born, and be taken in and raised by his grandparents. However, that's effectively the equivalent of having a girl whose been raped at thirteen give birth to the baby, and then being forced to raise it with her parents. It could be equally damaging.

So, I think, in this situation there needs to be a discussion with the boy, his parents, and a therapist. The boy and his family should get to make the decision on what to do with the pregnancy, since she voided all her rights as a parent the moment she coerced him into having sex with her. No matter what happens, she'll never see that child, preferably because she'll never get out of prison.

The goal should be to minimize the damage to the victim.

 

How revolting!

 

Not rape? This is straight-up pedophilia. A 13 year-old can't consent to sex with an adult, and ESPECIALLY not if this adult is lying about their age.

 

I don't know about sentencing a child to death, but it does make me squeamish. No matter what said child should NOT be left in her care, but forcing a procedure on someone is a weird ethical line.

 

I don't know about the whole 'sentencing a child to death' thing, unless she's about to pop it out or something, but I understand about the squeamishness.

However, what real alternatives are there? You basically have three choices:

1. Abort the fetus.
2. Place the infant in foster care, hopefully to be adopted.
3. Place the infant in the care of the grandparents of the boy she raped.

If you select option number two, then the thirteen year old victim is going to grow up knowing he has a child somewhere out in the world. He isn't going to know who that child is, or whether or not they had a decent life. Imagine growing up knowing you had a kid somewhere out there in the world, and then imagine how bad you'd probably feel if things went poorly for them. For example, they grew up in foster care with no family, or they grew up believing that they had parents who simply didn't want them. Or perhaps just as bad, they grow up knowing the truth that they were the product of rape, and therefore wasn't wanted as a child.

If you select option number three, it might seem like the best solution. However, you're effectively forcing a thirteen year old kid into becoming a father, and forcing him to raise his own rape-baby. If the genders were reversed here, we wouldn't want a young thirteen year old girl being forced to give birth to and raise her rape-baby. Yet, that's basically what we're doing to the boy in this case.

This leaves us with option one. Out of the three options, I think it's the most humane to the thirteen year old victim. If he were a thirteen year old girl who was pregnant by rape, I think most people would probably feel that she should abort the child as it's in her best interest. I think this woman voided any rights she had to the child and the pregnancy the moment she decided to coerce him into having sex with her, and therefore the choice on what to do falls to the thirteen year old boy and his parents. They should be the ones, with the support and guidance of a qualified therapist, to decide what the ultimate fate of the fetus or child should be.

Maybe I'm missing something, but these seem like the only options to me. In my mind, despite the squeamish nature of what has happened, the goal should be to do what is in the thirteen year old's best interest. He's the victim here, and we shouldn't loose sight of that no matter how squeamish it might seem.

 

Every argument ever invented can be used against someone. 'People' who get off by torturing and humiliating others are nothing more than hollow vessels, not human beings. Pedophiles and rapists don't have rights. If they have the urge, they shouldn't exist.

 

You know. Plenty of people post in the anonymous section upset and confused because they found a young teen attractive.

They don't need to see this.

Urges do not make a person evil.