1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

General News Birth control will be available without prescription in CA

Discussion in 'Current Events, World News, & LGBT News' started by anthonythegamer, Aug 21, 2015.

  1. DreamerBoy17

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2014
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    United States
    Gender:
    Male (trans*)
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Wait, what? Women had to go to a doctor for birth control? I don't see the point in that at all.
     
  2. thepandaboss

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2015
    Messages:
    2,436
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Oregon
    Yeah. You had to have a prescription. In some cases you could've gotten a prescription from places like Planned Parenthood or community clinics but the fact remains, getting it from a pharmacy requires a prescription. Insurance, to its credit, will usually cover 100% of the cost when it comes to getting the pills.

    Oh believe me, I actually know a lot of people who are going to be happy about this, cis women and trans men. I can tell you from my own doctor that dealing with prescriptions is a pain in the ass. And considering how beneficial prescription free birth control could be (easy access for the uninsured and people in bad situations), I dunno why this didn't happen sooner. They're talking about doing the same thing in Oregon.
     
  3. DreamerBoy17

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2014
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    United States
    Gender:
    Male (trans*)
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    I just don't get why it was even a requirement in the first place, I mean, men have easy access to condoms. Does it have bad side affects for some people?
     
  4. I believe it's the fact that it is a pill full of hormones and people didn't feel comfortable having it available like condoms. However, that doesn't really make sense since melatonin is a hormone that is sold like ZzzQuil. Also, hormonal contraceptives can cause abnormal mood changes and a slight increase in blood clot risk. That's why women will need to have their blood pressure taken by their pharmacist before getting birth control.

    ---------- Post added 21st Aug 2015 at 08:19 PM ----------

    They've already done it! :grin:
     
    #5 anthonythegamer, Aug 21, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 21, 2015
  5. Gen

    Gen
    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2012
    Messages:
    4,070
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Birth control does come with potential side effects as all routine medication.

    This is a good step because women without coverage or support from parental figures will be able to access birth control without the requirement, but it would still be best that a professional is consulted prior and every so often.
     
  6. MetalRice

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2015
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Florida
    Excellent news.
     
  7. RainDreamer

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,323
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am pretty sure female condom are also readily available without prescription.

    Now, if there is a pill that prevent sperm creation in men, I think that too would require prescription.
     
  8. Hiems

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,183
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New Jersey
    I am concerned about how this would be implemented in the retail setting. Pharmacists have to follow up with patients and counsel them, which could be time consuming and thus burdensome to retail pharmacies that have a high prescription volume. For instance, if the patient has side effects from hormonal contraceptives, then the pharmacist may need to titrate the dose of certain hormones based on the side effects presented. And apart from screening for stage 2 hypertension as already mentioned, clinicians would need to check for a past medical history too, of which the patient may not be fully aware, unless their physician is contacted. Contacting doctors ends up being a hassle too.

    Perhaps pharmacy access to patient's electronic health records from their physician would expedite the screening process for past medical history, but even then, not all physician's offices use electronic health records...

    These are the problems that I see with this law, but apart from them, I think this law is great for patients who want readily available access to contraceptive products, as pharmacies are pretty ubiquitous.
     
    #9 Hiems, Aug 22, 2015
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2015