1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DOMA section 3 unconstitutional!

Discussion in 'Current Events, World News, & LGBT News' started by Zumbro, Jul 8, 2010.

  1. Zumbro

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2010
    Messages:
    341
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Troy, NY
  2. Lady Gaga

    Lady Gaga Guest

    It's time for a sexy party!
     
  3. Revan

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Messages:
    7,853
    Likes Received:
    36
    Location:
    Canada
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Now just to repeal the entire goddamn thing...
     
  4. Étoile

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Peach State
    This is a bitter double-edged sword.

    While it makes it impossible to repeal gay marriage on the federal level...it makes it impossible to approve gay marriage on the federal level.

    This leaves the power to each states. This could mean decades for some states to approve gay marriage, especially those with constitutional bans. :frowning2:
     
  5. Emberstone

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2008
    Messages:
    6,680
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Oregon, USA
    forgive me, I dont really understand exactly how this makes it impossible to repeal it on a federal level?

    I was under the impression that this was striking specific things as unconstitutional here and now. it didnt say that the rest of it was constitutional. My impression was that this was a effort to break through the easiset to repeal aspects, and slowly erode away at the whole. Rather then try to force the entire issue, work to get concessions on what is pressing for the existing married couples. that way, we can show that by having equal benifits will not destory the econamy, as some conservative, non econamist politicians have tried to claim. then, we can systematically dismantle the rest as we garner more support.
     
  6. Lady Gaga

    Lady Gaga Guest

    According to Yahoo, this ruling makes the entire act unconstitutional.

    But then again, it's Yahoo. Notorious for getting things wrong.
     
  7. Just Adam

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,435
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    My AV room
    lets just get rid of DOMA on the basis its just wrong.
     
  8. Étoile

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Peach State
    If we could use that logic, the homophobes could too.
     
  9. Emberstone

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2008
    Messages:
    6,680
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Oregon, USA
    oxymoron... homophobes are incapable of even the most basic of logic.
     
  10. Just Adam

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,435
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    My AV room

    thats fine by me if they want to get rid of doma cos its just wrong be my guest :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:


    but it is wrong morally and ethically...:S

    where as love isnt wrong when its between two consenting people.
     
  11. excuseyou77

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Duluth, GA
    Gender:
    Male
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Just heard this on TV. Such great news!!
     
  12. Alex19

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2009
    Messages:
    1,157
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York
    i love it. so amazing that good stuff is finally happening (!)
     
  13. Dan82

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,754
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago IL
    I hate to throw water on the celebration but I need to point out that this is just a district court ruling, it will at the very least have one appeal and possible more. This ruling really doesn’t mean anything.
     
  14. mydogstewie

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2009
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    0
    ... :frowning2:
     
  15. Nodnarb

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,430
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ames, Iowa
    Huge, awesome news! However, as I understand it it sounds like this only applies to Massachusetts couples. The federal government now has to decide whether or not to appeal. If they do, then it goes the First Circuit court. If the decision is upheld there, it would then also apply to New Hampshire couples. From there it would go to SCOTUS, which obviously would apply to the whole country. If it gets to SCOTUS, Justice Kennedy would likely be the swing vote. I don't want to get too optimistic, but I could see him giving us the 5-4 win. It couldn't even pass 'rational basis', afterall...But that would be a long, long ways in the future anyways...
     
  16. Étoile

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Peach State
    :eusa_clap Good one.

    Dan82, so this really means diddly-squat? :frowning2:
     
  17. Lady Gaga

    Lady Gaga Guest

    Actually, it means a lot.

    You know how many court cases have been won in the supreme court because of just one being won in a district court?

    A lot. And I mean a lot.
     
  18. Étoile

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Peach State
    CNN was talking about it a few seconds ago and they said this could reach the Supreme Court. If they allow it, gay marriage could be a constitutional right in all states.
     
  19. Lady Gaga

    Lady Gaga Guest

    Even the possibility sends chills down my spine! (In a good way)

    <3

    Although, it's probably too good to be true. :frowning2:
     
  20. chained butterfly

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Messages:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    new york
    Please let this go through :/ Im hoping that by the time I want to marry someone it would be legal everywhere in the US..... hopefully......:frowning2:

    or at least in NY