1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Radio host: AIDS discriminates against the ’stupid behavior’ of homosexuality

Discussion in 'Current Events, World News, & LGBT News' started by Dan82, Aug 20, 2010.

  1. Dan82

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,754
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago IL
    http://iowaindependent.com/41649/ra...-against-the-stupid-behavior-of-homosexuality

     
  2. Just Adam

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,435
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    My AV room
    hes right yet very wrong,....sure our actions lead to the problems in a lot of cases, but losing weight or stopping something when your addicted isn't easy..,.as for aids well that can be a result of anything from sex to a blood transfusion... you don't necessarily do anything stupid to get it...

    :frowning2: its sad people believe in gods law and what happens to us is our own fault :frowning2: lifes a bitch simple as that it has no reason for whos life it trys to ruin, we just need to muddle on... hes got to learn that.
     
  3. excuseyou77

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Duluth, GA
    Gender:
    Male
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Again I am REALLY sick of some people's idiocy and bigotry based on AIDS. Hopefully someone will get it through these folks' heads that ANYONE no matter who they are can get it. They should really look up some damn facts before opening their mouths on something they obviously need MAJOR schooling on.
     
  4. kettlkorn

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Little Neck, NY
    If AIDS doesn't discriminate then I think Jan Mickelson should take his own advice and stop having sex. Although he's probably not getting any at all anyway
     
  5. Emberstone

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2008
    Messages:
    6,680
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Oregon, USA
    fuck him. how dare he.

    my dad has been a runner all his life. he has been physically fit all his life, and never even close to being ten pounds over weight. he has ate healthy his whole life, and is a marathon runner.

    he also is a diabetes. diabetes is not caused by being fat. diabetes has genetic precursers to it. being over weight is not the cause, but it does not agrivate it.

    having aids is not because you are gay. oddly enough the majority of people with aides are heterosexual. fuck this basterd for being a uneducated jackass.

    if cirrosis and lung cancer are caused by behaviors, and aids is caused by behaivors, you cant say the first two dont discriminate, but the third one does.


    HE IS A FUCKING WIFE BEATING SHOCK JOCK, NOTHING MORE.

    a uneducated peice of shit who likes to put everyone down in a "you are shit, dont look at my penis (cause its tiny) fuckwad.
     
  6. NickT

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    567
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Unsafe sex, regardless of orientation, is stupid. Really, is there a difference between having sex with a female with AIDS and having sex with a male with AIDS? I thought not. He's completely missing the point.
     
  7. gattsuru

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    For men? As a percentage matter, male-male penetrative sex is more likely to involve anal sex than male-female penetrative, and anal sex with an individual who is HIV+ or has unknown status is risky -- the receptive partner is looking at somewhere between at three and twenty times the risk of infection as compared to receptive vaginal, while the penetrating partner faces between a 20% greater risk to a 100% greater risk. Wikipedia has a chart on the matter at their HIV#transmission page. The CDC says that the chances of a random man who has sex with men being HIV+ is something like forty times greater than that of a random sampling of the entire adult population. This isn't to defend that ignorant fool, or say anything about morality -- a lot of the difference simply reflects that the disease got a very early foothold in the gay male populace, before testing and prevention methods (or even the disease itself) were well-known -- just to provide the risk numbers.

    On the other hand, female-female sexual conduct is less risky than both male-male and male-female, and many male-male subcultures are significantly better about condom use than the general population (with the caveat that condoms significantly reduce, rather than absolutely eliminate, the risk of HIV transmission).

    In short, it's stupid to have unprotected sex with someone you don't know the HIV status of, and deadly stupid to have unprotected sex with someone you have reason to believe is HIV+ -- but the hets have significantly more space to be stupid in.
     
    #7 gattsuru, Aug 20, 2010
    Last edited: Aug 20, 2010
  8. NickT

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    567
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kentucky
    That's what I mean, if someone has HIV, and you don't want to get it, then you don't have sex with him/her. Gender, orientation, etc. doesn't matter.
     
  9. Kardan

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2009
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    South-eastern Nebraska
    Gender:
    Male
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    The problem with AIDS being a punishment from god is that humans contracted the disease from monkeys. If it is god's punishment, then god is a monkey. Transitive property of stupid.