1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Poll: Importance of Politics

Discussion in 'Current Events, World News, & LGBT News' started by Steve712, Jan 22, 2011.

?

Do you see the importance of participation and active citizenship in a democracy?

  1. Yes and I participate.

    31 vote(s)
    75.6%
  2. Yes, but I do not participate.

    4 vote(s)
    9.8%
  3. No and I do not participate.

    6 vote(s)
    14.6%
  4. No, but I partipate.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Steve712

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Some people
    I want to see how the numbers for political apathy look among you. Although the amount of apathetic youth generally is despairingly high, I am curious to see how this changes when we look just at a minority actively fighting for its rights.

    If you would elaborate upon your position, that would be great!
     
    #1 Steve712, Jan 22, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2011
  2. MIJ VI

    MIJ VI Guest

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2010
    Messages:
    276
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Earth
    Gender:
    Male
    I've voted in every federal Punch & Judy show convened to allow pick-pockets to work the crowd since '93, and I've been voting for the Green Party (or as near as I could when the Greens didn't run a candidate) since 2000.

    I lost faith in the Green Party in '08 when its new leader Elizabeth May figuratively donned knee pads to cut deals with the Liberals in an effort to beat some Conservative candidates in a number of ridings.

    This politically naive move cost the Greens their their only unique asset IMO: their credibility.

    If I bother to vote again it will be to destroy my ballot in protest of Canada's first-past-the-post electoral system--or hopefully some LGBT rights-related issue instead.
     
  3. zeratul

    zeratul Guest

    I do not believe in the "hiring" stages of a democratic process, in other words, I do not see the importance of the election campaigns, all propaganda and unrealistic promises to me.

    What I do believe in is the combined result of democracy and principle of the rule of law. It gives the people a right to voice complaint when our leaders are abusing their privileges or making inconsiderate decisions, and it also protects minorities against the tyranny of the majority so that we don't have mob rule.
     
  4. Steve712

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Some people
    What do you propose as an alternative to campaigning? Is it possible to run a democratic election without campaigning?

    The campaigning season provides the foundation for accountability. Candidates have the opportunity to present their case to the people and tell them what they wish to do to solve the various problems in the jurisdiction of the election. As everyone knows, politicians often fail to keep their promises. Why do they do this? Well, the populous has adopted a resigned perspective concerning broken campaign promises and other minor power abuses. To most people, it's simply natural that politicians conduct themselves in a corrupt manner and that they not do what they claim they will do. Were people to hold the politicians who break these promises accountable (writing letters, organising peaceful protests, voting for someone else, ruining the ballot, raise awareness through the media, etc.), we would not see this happening nearly as much. Politicians would have pressure to keep as many of there promises as possible lest they lose their job. Instead, people don't speak up until something major happens. Sometimes, that comes far too late.
     
  5. zeratul

    zeratul Guest

    Yes but you forget that the mainstream media portrays us as extreme liberals and trouble makers. Whatever we cry about during the campaign season is just mumbo jumbo to their ears, and the majority of the mainstream voters just go with whatever they click with. Like, for me for example, I click with the Liberals, so I always vote for them no matter what. It doesnt matter to me if its Stephen Harper or Ignatieff as prime minister, we have had a minority government and several elections in the past few years. It doesnt change a thing.
     
  6. Steve712

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Some people
    The last government of New Brunswick under liberal Shawn Graham attempted to sell NB Power to Hydro Québec in a back-room deal. The people of New Brunswick did not like this one bit. So what did they do? They did exactly what I listed in my prior post. They organised protests, they went on air with their opinions, they wrote to the premier and their representatives. What happened? The deal stopped. The politicians bended to the will of the people out of fear for their jobs. Of course, come the next election the disgruntled people of New Brunswick booted them from office anyhow and elected a majority conversative government under David Alward.

    This brings me to your point about it seeming not to change anything. If all you do is switch between the blue and red, you're right, it's very possible that nothing will ever change. The two parties seem to be the same thing. The thing is that there are other alternatives. The NDP, for example, has had a wonderful provincial track record. They have supported social programmes and they have balanced various provincial budgets. Tommy Dougles, the former NDP premier of Saskatchewan, brought you and I and all fellow Canadians universal health care.

    You ought to be careful not to vote for one party out of tradition. Read their platforms, keep track of what they say at press releases. Watch the televised leaders debate! You'll find that the tories and liberals often bicker amongst one another and spout rhetoric while the other parties voice ideas and spout rhetoric. Which is the better alternative? :wink:
     
  7. zeratul

    zeratul Guest

    I will not vote NDP in the federal government because all they want to do is to tax tax spend spend Jack Layton should go before I consider them.. I thought that green party women, Elizabeth May? did a fine job in the televised debate. very impassionate, very logical woman, not ambitious for the sake of power. Too bad the green party did not field a rep in my district otherwise i would have voted them.
     
  8. Steve712

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Some people
    Ah, taxes. See, most governments indulge the age-old tax cut rhetoric to become elected. They do this because it works. People just see themselves saving money rather than losing all of the programmes which taxes fund. These include medicare, education, welfare, EI, subsidised housing, etc.

    Currently, anyone unable to find a job is in poverty. Neither welfare nor EI provide enough money to bring someone above the poverty line; they do not provide living wages. The government could fix this if they would tax the richest of the rich more in order to support those who struggle with poverty. They could also provide more full-time jobs by taxing big industries in order to support small businesses. The rich and their corporations could easily afford this and it would be a huge leap toward eradicating poverty.

    Although this is a provincial issue, it is just as important: Classroom sizes in Canada have been steadily growing and the equipment in many schools is out of date. This is because education often receives the blunt end of the government's tax cut promises. Fewer teachers can be hired with less funding. The reason why there are school fees is due to cuts to education. Public education would be free if it were properly funded.

    Canada has experienced many cuts in health care, too. This results in longer wait times for surgery and check-ups. It also creates a low doctor retention rate from our medical schools; most of our newly graduated doctors go to the US and elsewhere abroad. There is simply not enougn money to pay the amouny of doctors which the nation needs.

    So, really, we need to raise taxes. We could do this intelligently by increasing the scope of the current taxation system; that is, increase the rate of taxation for higher incomes and revenues.
     
  9. zeratul

    zeratul Guest

    The problem with that is that then businesses will come up with all kinds of ways to avoid paying taxes, and the only ones that will be hurt are the individuals.

    On a basic level, they will continue to more aggressively outsource jobs. On a higher level, businesses can often evade taxes by doing transactions in low-taxing countries and bringing in to our own country enough money to only pay their employees, which can then be reported as an expense, which is deducted from taxable income.

    We have to accept that we can only pay or some but not other social programs and there are limitations. I am by no means a conservative or right wing person. But in my opinion, if you want to perfectly plan out a host of social programs that you can pay for, and control their impact on the economic development as a whole, then we have to say, here, let us develop a comprehensive strategic plan that will apply for the next 5 to 10 years, let us plan out our economy, areas/industries in which to invest, how much tax will be collected and what additional legislations must be passed in order to support it properly, and then we stick with it until the end.

    See, this cannot happen in a democracy. Because there will be squabling in parliament and and basically people saying, ZOMG That is a socialist regime. But anyone knows that without a well thought out plan to accomplish a reasonable goal, and the willpower to follow it through completely and utterly, you can't achieve it. To hope otherwise would be unscientific and illogical.

    So I rest my case that in our current political environment/temperature, we cannot really achieve what you are dreaming about.
     
  10. maverick

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    1,643
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Alabama *cue banjos*
    So far as I've seen in my adolescence and young adulthood, government is stupid, corrupt, greedy and violent. As a result, I'm completely disillusioned with it at this point. I'm tired of red vs. blue. I don't support any of these people to have more governance over my life than I do.

    Until someone runs that I actually support, I am not voting for any of these others.

    However, I do believe in strong local communities with the ability to run themselves in self-sustaining ways. And I believe in egalitarian society.

    Otherwise, I wash my hands of the lot of them.
     
  11. Pseudojim

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,868
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Australia
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    it is illegal not to vote in my country, at either local, state, or federal level. Good system, imo.
     
  12. tiredofsleep

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2010
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    MN
    Gender:
    Male
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    First of all since I don't have a loc. given I'm speaking as an American. I'm with Maverick on this one, red and blue is all bs. The greed of money and power rules (this country anyway)...
    I voted in 2008 mostly because I was pressured into it and because I just turned 18 and I could, that was back when I was stupid and thought that my vote mattered at all. If you are from the states you hear every election period about votes not being counted properly and tampered with, and that's just the tip of an enormous iceberg, the scarier part of this is "why is the news even telling us this?" because the news IS editted to tell us only specific things, believe it. The ugly truth is... well, I'm not going to get into details because it would take several hours and about 500K words to explain all the bs, but let's just say our country is going braindead thanks to the media, (do you know how many people pick candidates here based on just physical looks?!?!) who is ultimately ran by the red and blue ($$$$!) it's really a sad, and scary joke all in all if you ask me, but I'm kind of out there politically, I realize it lol.... that's just my view..
    But yes, being that we are a minority, complete apathy probably isn't the best solution, but then I don't know what else to do I am busy with the rest of my lfie as it is...
     
  13. Fintan

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2010
    Messages:
    574
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    I work in politics in Canada. I work for a politician. And I can say, that I believe he entered politics for the right reasons. He works hard to voice the views of his community in parliament and fights for what his community needs improved by the government. And frankly, I believe most politicians that I have had close encounters with are also in it for the right reasons. And, I know I will be attacked for saying this, but frankly, I don't know very many people that put in the hours a week that my boss does. He works Mon-Thurs at Parliament, in a city far away from his home and family, and then Friday-Sun (times depend on local events) in his home constituency. Not to mention the commute between the two locations.

    As for democracy -- we are all taught in school that it is this fantastical system, near perfect, that the British gave to us. Well, I am not going to say democracy isn't the best option (because it is), but after working in politics it certainly does have its downfalls. Since my boss' job (an subsequently my job) depends on the roughly 70,000 voters in his constituency, I am required to spend a heck of a lot of time preparing a database of those who vote, and those who will vote for us, preparing fundraisers, political advertising, newspaper columns etc etc. Democracy (aka keeping the voters happy) is VERY time consuming (thankfully, Canada is not like America, and we have a spending limit, which limits the amount of effort I need to put into raising money).

    When not fulfilling the requirements of democracy -- I feel like I can actually do my job. This includes preparing speeches, petitions etc which raise the concerns of our local public in parliament and outside. Responding to legitimate letters from locals about problems they have with government and attempting to fix them. And dealing with major issues, like protecting jobs from industries that without gov't intervention will close, bringing investment to our region, changing gov't laws and regulation for the better etc. Recently, I have spent intermittent time over the last year pushing the gov't to revise long-distance ambulance routes which due to a lot of red-tape has directly caused the deaths of a few in our local area and ambulance travel time can have serious negative affects on urgent care patients. It is this stuff, that I got into politics for, democracy is just a time-consuming necessary evil I have to live with, I guess.

    And let me in on a little secret. For those that say it's pointless to vote and they don't vote. I thank you -- because you're one less person that we have to listen to. (Ok, maybe that was a bit flippant!)

    You see all political offices, receive an official list of electors (people that voted in the last election) and we know, those are the people we need to care about, because they decide the future of our region. If you've never voted, you're not on the list, and we don't take you nearly as seriously as those that ARE on the list. Not to say that we won't bother responding, but frankly, we are understaffed and don't have the time to do everything, so listening to the views of non-voters are an easy group to cut out. When deciding on which issues I need to focus on, a voter or a group of voters with a problem, matters far for than a non-voters concerns. That might sound harsh, but think of it this way. When I work with a voter, they are essentially my supervisor, I depend on them to keep my job. So I know, if I do a crappy job for a voter, I risk losing their vote, or if I do a good job, I might gain or retain their vote. So when a non-voter comes along for help or with a concern, someone who refuses to evaluate me, wouldn't my time be better spent on the voter?
     
  14. Meropspusillus

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    597
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New Mexico
    Frankly, I think the most important thing about democracy is information. Forcing people to vote when they wouldn't kindof just enforces a bunch of uninformed voting. (Oh yeah, I'm gonna vote for such-and-such because his commercial was funny.)
     
  15. Steve712

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Some people
    The fact is that Australians are seeing voter turnout rates in the ninetienth percentile and beyond. The criminalisation of electoral truancy (haha, a good enough term ... :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:) has freed the poor of Australia from their workplaces so they can voice their opinion. Employers would not want to face the consequences of forcing their employees to stay at work and break the law, after all. This is something which doesn't exist in Canada or the US, thus we see voter turnouts ranging from fifty to sixty per cent in those countries. You'll find that Canada's recent turnout average of around fifty-five to sixty is more or less consistent with the amount of poor amount the eligible voters (approximately forty per cent), which has been steadily growing in parity with the decline in voter turnout (formerly averaging in the mid-seventieth percentile).

    ---------- Post added 23rd Jan 2011 at 12:25 PM ----------

    You're right about the reaction of corporations and I have realised this flaw for quite a while. I am still thinking of a way around it, but to do so I would probably have to contact some of my armchair economist friends. :lol:

    Cheers! :grin:

    ---------- Post added 23rd Jan 2011 at 12:41 PM ----------


    Hey! Thanks for adding a slightly different perspective to this discussion.

    This is exactly why people should vote and I'm glad that you explained this. Many people complain about the government, then come election time they refuse to go to the polls, even simply to ruin their ballot. I premuse that they don't realise that politicians, with their busy schedules, won't listen to people who don't bother to vote.

    People don't realise that democracy depends upon their participation to exist. The citizens of most democratic nations take for granted the responsibilities which come with their rights. I hope that enough people will awaken to their democratic responsibilities now so that, two generations down the road, people can still have those rights. The fewer the eligible voters who participate, the less accountable the politicians become, making it ever easier to use the power for whatever purposes they see fit, legitimate or not. The other danger, which is slightly unrelated to your post but still very relevant, is of course uninformed voting. This is why the media should realise its responsibility to report impartially and intelligently lest they too lose their freedom years down the road.

    These freedoms are already slowly eroding in nations with low voter turnout. It is my hope that people will awaken to this.
     
  16. tiredofsleep

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2010
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    MN
    Gender:
    Male
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Of course, it's easy to get foolish people to vote...
     
  17. zeratul

    zeratul Guest

    While this discussion has turned into a discussion about the importance of voting, I strongly encourage you to re-read what I originally said. My point is that while voting is an inevitable process in determining which party is the ruler and which party is the opposition, the ideal of democracy itself is not about this. It is about a process of making Government a feedback loop, rather than a linear I/O system.

    While the election is a tool to give feedback on Government performance, it happens at a frequency far too slow to do anything in the modern times when we are not limited by communication interval. The idea of using election as a means to gather feedback ought to be obsolete. What needs to happen is more participation during the non-election times as well, when decisions are being made. The time of the public hearing or consultation is the time for your voices to be heard. Election in this environment of mostly red vs. blue is simply becoming less important, especially in Canada at this moment in time when the Liberals can easily overthrow the government, the NDP and Bloc Quebecois are just dying to do that. But really? Do we want another election where its going to end up just the same way?

    And that attitude from Fintan, where a representative only hears the voice of the constituents that voted, needs to stop, it is nonconductive to the operation of this country.

    You have to perfectly understand that we are first and foremost a country governed by the "principal of fundamental justice" under the "rule of law" before it is ever a democracy. The law giveth democracy, and the law can taketh it away.
     
  18. Steve712

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Some people
    I think you'll find that I called for more than simply voting when I spoke of participation. :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes: Still, voting determines who the leaders are and is therefore of particular importance.
     
  19. zeratul

    zeratul Guest

    We can agree to disagree. Cheers.
     
  20. partietraumatic

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    1,184
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Oxford and Birmingham, UK
    I vote, and always will do. I think it's important to exercise my democratic right. I feel like there are so many people around the world who cannot have a say in the running of their country, that it would be innapropriate and disrespectful to those people to not do so here.

    Equally i feel like one forfeits the right to complain about the state of things if you don't bother voting.

    I know people will say how one vote doesn't make a difference. But its an ideological thing to me. If everyone who didn't bother voting, or didn't vote for who they really wanted, followed their ideals, then perhaps one vote would make a difference.

    These are just my opinions, i'm aware that some people hold completely different views.