1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Romney Signs Anti-Gay Marriage Pledge, Pawlenty Doesn’t

Discussion in 'Current Events, World News, & LGBT News' started by Dan82, Aug 4, 2011.

  1. Dan82

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,754
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago IL
    http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2011/08/04/romney-signs-anti-gay-marriage-pledge-pawlenty-doesnt/


     
  2. Emberstone

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2008
    Messages:
    6,680
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Oregon, USA
    so basically, romney opposes the constitution...

    equal and due process under the law, beyotch!
     
  3. Revan

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Messages:
    7,853
    Likes Received:
    36
    Location:
    Canada
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Can God just come down already and have a talk with NOM? They're a bunch of religious idiots and need a good talking to...
     
  4. Random Dent

    Random Dent Guest

    Or, better yet, let their rapture take them all away!
     
  5. BlueDuck

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Messages:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Gender:
    Male
    .... I'm actually surprised that Pawlenty didn't. (not that this pledge isn't f**king crazy and stupid and idiotic. because it is.)
     
  6. Mr.Pushover

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    Messages:
    418
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Maryland
  7. ezkill

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    207
    Likes Received:
    0
    How long is it going to take for people to full accept us?
     
  8. Emberstone

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2008
    Messages:
    6,680
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Oregon, USA
    make no mistake, they would not recognize God. Their idea of traditional marriage has no real basis on what the bible considers biblical marriage. big contradictions between the bible and nom's view of marriage is that in the bible, marriage is a tranferense of property ownership, in that the women is transfered as an object from the control of her father, to the control of her husband. Biblical marriage also was that men can have more than one wife. Biblical marriage also does not requsited love, and love was frowned upon. Marriages in bible times were prearranged without the consent of the husband or wife.

    If they are going to claim to be upholding traditional marriage with a religious ferver and slant, they need to at the very least conform to the marriage found in the bible. but they dont, because their marriages do not conform... except maggie gallagher's multiple marriages... she is incapable of love, so she fits the bill in the 'love doesnt matter' area.