1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Scalia says abortion, gay rights are easy cases

Discussion in 'Current Events, World News, & LGBT News' started by Dan82, Oct 7, 2012.

  1. Dan82

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,754
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago IL
    http://news.yahoo.com/scalia-says-abortion-gay-rights-easy-cases-073501926.html


     
  2. Mogget

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,397
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    New England
    I suppose Loving v Virginia would've been an easy case for Scalia, too.
     
  3. Dan82

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,754
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago IL
    I believe he's said he agrees with the outcome.
     
  4. Mogget

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,397
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    New England
    He has to. If he publicly said it was wrong there'd be a massive public outcry, he'd probably be forced to resign.
     
  5. Dan82

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,754
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago IL
    I doubt he actually has much problem with it; interracial marriage isn’t something that bothers northern Catholics of his age.
     
  6. Mogget

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,397
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    New England
    I'm operating under the assumption that he actually believes in interpreting the Constitution the way he says he does. Which would mean ruling for Virginia, against Loving.
     
  7. Pret Allez

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    6,785
    Likes Received:
    67
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Gender:
    Female (trans*)
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Some people
    Well, he lost in both Romer and Lawrence, and where he was reduced to simply QQing in his dissents about how pure democracies are awesome. Textualism is actually a catatonically stupid judicial philosophy anyway.
     
    #7 Pret Allez, Oct 7, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2012