Why Dennis Prager opposes Sane-Sex Marriage

Dan82 · Oct 22, 2012

http://townhall.com/columnists/denn...fornia_decision_will_radically_change_society

... Outside of the privacy of their homes, young girls will be discouraged from imagining one day marrying their prince charming -- to do so would be declared "heterosexist," morally equivalent to racist. Rather, they will be told to imagine a prince or a princess. Schoolbooks will not be allowed to describe marriage in male-female ways alone. Little girls will be asked by other girls and by teachers if they want one day to marry a man or a woman.

The sexual confusion that same-sex marriage will create among young people is not fully measurable. Suffice it to say that, contrary to the sexual know-nothings who believe that sexual orientation is fixed from birth and permanent, the fact is that sexual orientation is more of a continuum that ranges from exclusive heterosexuality to exclusive homosexuality. Much of humanity -- especially females -- can enjoy homosexual sex. It is up to society to channel polymorphous human sexuality into an exclusively heterosexual direction -- until now, accomplished through marriage. But that of course is "heterosexism," a bigoted preference for man-woman erotic love, and therefore to be extirpated from society.

Any advocacy of man-woman marriage alone will be regarded morally as hate speech, and shortly thereafter it will be deemed so in law.

Companies that advertise engagement rings will have to show a man putting a ring on a man's finger -- if they show only women fingers, they will be boycotted just as a company having racist ads would be now.

Films that only show man-woman married couples will be regarded as antisocial and as morally irresponsible as films that show people smoking have become...

http://townhall.com/columnists/denn...fornia_decision_will_radically_change_society
Click to expand...

Rakkaus · Oct 22, 2012

Who's Dennis Prager?

Dan82 · Oct 22, 2012

Rakkaus said: ↑

Who's Dennis Prager?
Click to expand...

a pseudo intellectual version of Rush Limbaugh

here's his wikipedia page

here are the archives of his columns

Ruthven · Oct 22, 2012

Unsurprisingly, that was an absolutely ridiculous read.

Anticipating reactions to this column -- as to all defenses of man-woman marriage -- that it or its author are "homophobic," i.e., bigoted and unworthy of respectful rejoinder, it is important to reaffirm that nothing written here is implicitly, let alone explicitly, anti-gay. I take it as axiomatic that a gay man or woman is created in God's image and as precious as any other human being. And I readily acknowledge that it is unfair when an adult is not allowed to marry the love of his or her choice. But social policy cannot be made solely on the basis of eradicating all of life's unfairness. Thus, we must love the gay person -- and his and or her partner as well. But we must never change the definition of marriage. The price to society and succeeding generations will be too great.
Click to expand...

This guy...:rolle:

Hot Pink · Oct 22, 2012

What arrogance! The judicial branch checking the legislature like the founding father's designed it to! I can't believe this!! How un-American is this?!

Why Dennis Prager opposes Sane-Sex Marriage

Dan82
Full Member

Rakkaus Guest

Dan82
Full Member

Ruthven
Regular Member

Hot Pink
Full Member

Why Dennis Prager opposes Sane-Sex Marriage

Thread Tools

Dan82 Full Member

Rakkaus Guest

Dan82 Full Member

Ruthven Regular Member

Hot Pink Full Member

Dan82
Full Member

Dan82
Full Member

Ruthven
Regular Member

Hot Pink
Full Member