General News omg, cispa is back again

Ticklish Fish · Apr 20, 2013

Mike McCaul cites Boston bombing as a reason why CISPA should be passed.

and somehow link boston bombing and north korea hacker with bullshit reason.

omg, wtf.

Aldrick · Apr 20, 2013

WTF?! God damn it not again.

Is there any word when the Senate will be voting on the proposal?

Sinopaa · Apr 20, 2013

*sighs* It's as if these idiots wake up in the morning thinking "so...how can I piss off the world today?". :bang:

Ticklish Fish · Apr 20, 2013

Sinopaa said: ↑

*sighs* It's as if these idiots wake up in the morning thinking "so...how can I piss off the world today?". :bang:
Click to expand...

I wake up every morning thinking how to be gayer? jkjk

Aldrick · Apr 20, 2013

On behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union, a non-partisan organization with over half a million members, countless additional activists and supporters, and 53 affiliates nationwide, we write in opposition to H.R. 3523, the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011. We ask that you delay markup to consider the privacy implications of the bill that would allow companies to share private data with the government. We urge you to amend the bill to include explicit collection and use limitations and rigorous oversight mechanisms. In the absence of such amendments, we will vigorously oppose this legislation as inconsistent with the long tradition of Americans’ reasonable expectations of privacy.

The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act would create a cybersecurity exception to all privacy laws and allow companies to share the private and personal data they hold on their American customers with the government for cybersecurity purposes. The bill would not limit the companies to sharing only technical, non-personal data. Instead, it would give the companies discretion to decide the type and amount of information to turn over to the government. If shared in good faith compliance with the statute, these entities would receive full liability protection and would be immune from criminal or civil liability, even after an egregious breach of privacy. Further, once an individual’s information is shared with the government, there would be no restriction on the use of that information. It could be used for any purpose whatsoever and shared with any agency. While such data might be used for cybersecurity purposes, there would be no bar on the government also using it to conduct fishing expeditions for criminal, immigration or other purposes.

Beyond the potential for massive data collection authorization, the bill would provide no meaningful oversight of, or accountability for, the use of these new information-sharing authorities. Congressional reporting would be delegated to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB). But the PCLOB has never been activated, therefore making it likely that no regular, institutionalized and substantive reporting will happen at all. Moreover, no federal agency or official has been tasked with issuing guidance to companies and government agencies as to how best protect privacy.

Writing a statute to govern the sharing of cybersecurity information is a complex and challenging task. But any new programs simply must respect privacy. The White House’s May legislative draft, the Recommendations of the House Republican Cybersecurity Task Force, and the Privacy Impact Assessment of Einstein 3 all contained more explicit privacy protections than the new bill. We encourage the committee to borrow from any of these documents in improving the privacy provisions of the legislation. Any new information-sharing legislation must at a minimum do the following:

* Narrowly define the privacy laws it will contravene. The committee must carefully consider what privacy laws truly inhibit necessary information-sharing and craft narrow exceptions limited to just those critical circumstances.

* House domestic cybersecurity efforts in a civilian agency. Congress must not empower military or intelligence agencies such as the National Security Agency to collect the internet usage data of Americans. Cybersecurity efforts on American soil should be led by the private sector, and any government information collection must be coordinated by a civilian government agency.

* Require companies to remove personally identifiable information (PII) from data they share with the government. While sharing technical data can take place without implicating civil liberties, a presumption of privacy should protect PII. Sharing PII should be an exception and not the norm, even if there could be certain limited exceptions to cover legitimate emergencies or other narrowly defined situations.

* Limit government use of information shared for cybersecurity purposes. Cybersecurity information-sharing should not become a windfall of data for the federal government to use as it pleases. Any information shared with the government must have strict use limitations to ensure that this new program doesn’t become an end run around privacy laws that would otherwise offer stronger protections.

* Create an oversight and accountability structure that includes public and congressional reporting. The executive branch must provide regular, substantive and public reporting, ideally by multiple Inspectors General and/or privacy officers.

We appreciate your consideration and look forward to working with you in the coming months as cybersecurity legislation advances through the House. Please contact Legislative Counsel Michelle Richardson if you should have questions or comments about this correspondence.

Sincerely,

Laura W. Murphy, Director, Washington Legislative Office
Michelle Richardson, Legislative Counsel
Click to expand...

That's what the ACLU had to say the first time the bill came up. You can view the letter here.

Although, this bill is different from SOPA and PIPA, it should be noted that it does attempt to define "intellectual property theft" as a type of cyberattack. At least it did in its original incarnation.

People should take a moment and think about just how much personal data about them is stored online by various private companies. Do we really want Google sharing all of it's data mining with... well anyone? I think the provisions proposed by the ACLU are very good and should be advocated, and if they are not included in the bill then it should die a horrible and swift death.

Ticklish Fish · Apr 20, 2013

^
I'm just personally more annoyed that they link north korea and the bombing to this bill... eh

Aldrick · Apr 20, 2013

Ticklish Fish said: ↑

^
I'm just personally more annoyed that they link north korea and the bombing to this bill... eh
Click to expand...

That's standard political bullshit. They say stuff like that, because that way if you oppose the bill they can attack you by saying, "Why do you support North Korean cyberattacks!?"

It's like when they were fighting to pass the Patriot Act, and if you opposed it you were attacked as anti-American.

BryanM · Apr 20, 2013

CISPA is cancer of the Internet. Hopefully it gets shot down in the senate, and if it passes there, I've heard Obama's senior advisors say that he would likely veto it. But yeah, CISPA is SOPA and PIPA's offspring.

Ridiculous · Apr 20, 2013

They sure like their acronyms don't they.

Revan · Apr 21, 2013

Can't believe it already passed the House...please Democrats don't let it pass the Senate...

BryanM · Apr 21, 2013

Ridiculous said: ↑

They sure like their acronyms don't they.
Click to expand...

Yep. I guess SOPA/PIPA/CISPA all sound more appealing than the Restriction of Internet and Violation of the Fourth Amendment Act.

Unknown5 · Apr 21, 2013

No, this can't pass

animequeen567 · Apr 21, 2013

This sure as hell better not pass!

Byron · Apr 21, 2013

I wonder, what is the possibility of 535 recall elections being held at the same time?

General News omg, cispa is back again

Ticklish Fish
Full Member

Aldrick
Full Member

Sinopaa
Full Member

Ticklish Fish
Full Member

Aldrick
Full Member

Ticklish Fish
Full Member

Aldrick
Full Member

BryanM
Full Member

Ridiculous
Full Member

Revan
Full Member

BryanM
Full Member

Unknown5 Guest

animequeen567
Full Member

Byron
Regular Member

General News omg, cispa is back again

Thread Tools

Ticklish Fish Full Member

Aldrick Full Member

Sinopaa Full Member

Ticklish Fish Full Member

Aldrick Full Member

Ticklish Fish Full Member

Aldrick Full Member

BryanM Full Member

Ridiculous Full Member

Revan Full Member

BryanM Full Member

Unknown5 Guest

animequeen567 Full Member

Byron Regular Member

Ticklish Fish
Full Member

Aldrick
Full Member

Sinopaa
Full Member

Ticklish Fish
Full Member

Aldrick
Full Member

Ticklish Fish
Full Member

Aldrick
Full Member

BryanM
Full Member

Ridiculous
Full Member

Revan
Full Member

BryanM
Full Member

animequeen567
Full Member

Byron
Regular Member