1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Human Centipede

Discussion in 'Entertainment and Technology' started by Atticus, Apr 26, 2012.

?

Watch it or nix it?

  1. Go for it! Excellent film, frightening, not much blood.

    6 vote(s)
    35.3%
  2. Run away! Way too much blood!

    11 vote(s)
    64.7%
  1. Atticus

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Columbus, MS
    I just watched this movie for the first time. It finished maybe ten minutes ago. Needless to say, I'm in danger of vomiting, but the sequel is on Netflix and I'm tempted to watch. I'm just not sure if I should. Have any of you guys seen "Full Sequence"? If you have, was there a terrible amount of blood? I'm quite squeamish but I found the first one wasn't so bad in this respect. It was probably the scariest movie I have ever seen, possibly tying with The Shining and Silence of the Lambs. They all terrify me for different reasons so they all win "scariest" for their categories. Anyway, should I or should I not watch The Human Centipede 2?
     
  2. Beachboi92

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,099
    Likes Received:
    1
    i don't remember how much blood there was but i do remember thinking i would rather stab myself in the face repeatedly than ever watch that movie or anything ever associated with it ever again.
     
  3. Atticus

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Columbus, MS
    Do you remember why you didn't like it? I was intrigued (for lack of a better word) by the first one and I'm interested in the second, but I'm a bit of a chicken.
     
  4. Pseudojim

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,868
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Australia
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    not watching it.
     
  5. Colton

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    415
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    California
    I'm not choosing either of those :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:

    I thought it was a horrible film, but in NO way was it too bloody. There was barely any in the movie. >_>
     
  6. Maddy

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Gender:
    Genderqueer
    Gender Pronoun:
    They
    Sexual Orientation:
    Lesbian
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Human Centipede 2's just a gore film that pretends to be more than a gore film by going meta. Don't bother.
     
  7. Chip

    Board Member Admin Team Advisor Full Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Messages:
    16,559
    Likes Received:
    4,757
    Location:
    northern CA
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    I've heard from several people that the 2nd one was simply beyond disgusting and had absolutely nothing redeeming about it.
     
  8. Lewis

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    1,477
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    I saw both of them for the first time a few weeks ago. Both are as disgusting as each other. I felt wrong just for watching it!
     
  9. Jonathan

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Illinois
    Those movies disgusted me to no end...
     
  10. CottonBolus

    CottonBolus Guest

    Don't; it's been banned in the UK. It's just too over the top to make watching it enjoyable.
     
  11. Rob999

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2012
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Christchurch, New Zealand
    Gender:
    Male
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    All but family
    The first was terrible, although more boring and badly made than it was disturbing.

    The second is apparently a movie truly not to watch, because it's just way over the top. The first gave me no desire to watch the second.
     
  12. Travel Tech

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2012
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    University of New Hampshire
    False Dichotomy. I choose the option of "Meh, nothing special. Go see it if you're into that kind of thing, although I was somewhat bored during the movie"
     
  13. Rosina

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Gender:
    Female
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Other
    Out Status:
    A few people
    There's practically no blood and that's not really the focus of it anyway. I still couldn't get through the first film all the way, it was just so poorly filmed but more importantly, it was just revolting. I can deal with blood, guts, gore - whatever your throw at me, I'm happy to watch it, but this is such a disgusting curve-ball. It's not so much horror as just plain awful. I can't see how people get any entertainment out of it.
     
  14. Pain

    Pain Guest

    NOT INTERESTED. Just hearing about it makes me sick :angry:
     
  15. GayJay

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Messages:
    538
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    North West, UK
    The film is pretty sickening but i think it is really original and do like the film.
     
  16. fireworks

    fireworks Guest

    I saw the ad and very nearly threw up.
    In other words, sounds AWESOME. :wink::wink: