When a guy is fucking you...

Pretty sure any time fluids of any kind are transferred there's a risk. With the condom, it's reduced to almost nothing, but keep in mind they can slip/break if you're not careful.

 

I've been curious about this myself.

 

It isn't risky as long as he's wearing an unexpired condom properly.

 

there is always risk, but with the condom you about 98% safe, you won't get better odds then that

 

If your scared of it leaking, just wear double.. or even better wear the whole box if you have to!

 

I thought the friction caused between two condoms when more than one is worn makes it far more likely for them to tear?

 

I think he's being a bit sarcastic. If not, he's being a bit stupid if he'll pardon my saying so. Friction does cause the condoms to break if there are multiple.

 

Steve speaks the truth. DO NOT use 2 condoms at once. Friction between each one will increase chances of breaking, defeating the purpose of each condom. 1 condom worn properly is enough.

 

I'd say it's very safe. It's not 100% safe, no, simply because condoms can break and tear. If you use them correctly, and use enough lubricant, then the chances of one breaking are quite small.

Lex

 

It is considered "safe".

 

Nope. XD It's not porous at all, otherwise it wouldn't be an effective contraceptive either.

 

Its like 99% safe. If the condom is being used properly, it should be fine.

 

Unless your friend is a doctor or other type of health professional, do you honestly consider him/her a credible source for this kind of information?

 

<pedantic>That is not quite true. All matter in the universe is porous. The question is if the largest pores are smaller than the smallest things you are trying to block.

The pores in latex condoms are smaller than sperm, bacteria cells, and virus partials. So they will prevent the pregnancy and STDs

On the other hand, the pores in sheepskin condoms are smaller than sperm but larger bacteria cells and virus partials. Thus they will prevent pregnancy, but will not prevent STDs.</pedantic>

 

I was wondering if someone would try to play the semantics game. I tip my hat, sir, in the general direction of the space between your temporary atomic shell.

 

:icon_bigg Glad to be of service.

 

Well, while we're being pedantic, those condoms are usually labeled lambskin (even though they're made from intestine, not skin).

But you are correct, they're not recommended for anal sex (and since they're expensive and smelly, I wouldn't recommend them for any sex ). For people who are sensitive to latex, there are polyurethane condoms that can be used. They're not quite as "stretchy" but they do the trick. You'll find them labeled as "non-latex" in brands such as Trojan Supra and Durex Avanti.

 

:roflmao: Hahaha, I can't believe I wrote sheepskin.