1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Does lack of split between sexual and romantic orientation apply to women, too?

Discussion in 'Sexual Orientation' started by NYCer, Dec 27, 2016.

  1. NYCer

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2016
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    New York
    Gender:
    Female
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Lesbian
    Out Status:
    Some people
    I've seen some people (e.g., Chip) say that there is no such thing as romantic orientation being separate from sexual. Does that apply to women as well? I'm in my 40s, and although the vast majority of my sexual fantasies ever since my early teens have been about women, I never really thought of myself as possibly gay until very recently when I was doing some "inner child" work and my "inner child" expressed a desire to have a girlfriend.

    I always thought of women in purely a sexual sense and never in a romantic sense, but I have felt romantic feelings for guys, which is why I never thought I was gay. I have fantasized about sex with guys only to the extent that the guy was somehow turned on by me, but I don't find sex with men per se arousing, if that makes sense. I sometimes found sex with men enjoyable but at some point I would fantasize about being with a woman. I've also heard that a majority of women have lesbian fantasies and aren't stimulated visually (i.e., get turned on by looking at men's bodies), so I thought I was pretty much straight except for my lesbian sexual fetishes.

    In my 20s I did date/hookup with a few women, but they didn't really work out. A couple of times the sex was amazing but then fizzled, and I thought I really didn't fit into lesbian culture, and so I decided the lesbian life wasn't for me and decided to focus on dating men exclusively and married a man, though I continued to have lesbian fantasies and look at lesbian porn, and recently divorced (due to ex-husband's infidelity).

    In terms of sexual fantasies, over my life time, I would say they are probably 99% lesbian and the last few years 99.9% lesbian. But I don't have any close, emotional bonds with other women and haven't really fell in love with a woman. I'm not sure if actually I've really been truly in love with anyone, though I have definitely have had crushes on guys and felt hurt when they didn't reciprocate.

    Also, part of me feels like maybe I'm looking to be gay as no attractive guy has recently found me attractive, and if I had just found the right guy, I wouldn't think about being lesbian (in order to orgasm, though, I would probably have to think of a woman). Or maybe I'm looking to be gay as some explanation of all my psychological issues, e.g., history of depression.

    Btw, I have recently had sex with a woman I met online and physically I enjoyed it a lot, but I don't feel any emotional connection with her or have any romantic feelings for her, but I am very much looking forward to having sex with her again.

    Sorry for this long post, but any thoughts would be greatly appreciated!
     
  2. Creativemind

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    Messages:
    3,281
    Likes Received:
    411
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Gender:
    Other
    Gender Pronoun:
    Other
    Sexual Orientation:
    Other
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    The sexual and romantic split originally was created for asexuals. Since not everyone who considered themselves asexual were "aromantic", the split helped clarify what genders they would date even though they didn't want sex.

    It was only later that other sexualities tried to use it for themselves to make sense of their sexualities.

    In siome cases, It's fine. I would rather a woman come up to me and say she was a "heteromantic bisexual" instead of just "bisexual" so I know not to waste my time. If she called herself bisexual, even though it is correct, it doesn't tell me what she's looking for so it's not always helpful.

    Other times, I am skeptical of the split. I am most skeptical of people who say they are sexually attracted to the same sex and romantically attracted only to the opposite. 9 times out of 10, being "heteromantic homosexual" is due to internalized homophobia and not yet accepting yourself.

    It's very very common for someone to think they're only sexually attracted to the same sex and not romantically, because of cultural brainwashing. We're fed beliefs that you can only find love, marriage, children, and a happy life of privilege with the opposite sex. Same sex romance is "weird". Same sex romance is wrong and will get you discriminated against or fired.

    On the other hand, you can have sex with the same sex in a discreet way without getting caught. It's acceptable for women to have sex with women if It's ONLY sex, but loving a woman makes you a dyke that will burn in hell. Holding hands, kissing, loving the same sex can feel wrong or "strange" because of these messages, even if one thinks they're not affected by them.

    I think the split applies equally to men and women. Women who are sexually attracted to women but not romantically usually also have internalized homophobia and can't imagine the idea yet. But eventually, they may come around and "get used to it" after accepting their sexuality.

    Now, that's not to say that It's completely impossible to be genuinely sexually attracted to the same sex and not romantically, but It's very uncommon. You may be a person who has their orientation genuinely this way, but for most people it needs some inspection.

    By the way, I've always been the opposite. I was always romantically attracted to women, wanted to kiss them, hold their hands, and call them my girlfriend....but had no sexual fantasies and thought sex with women was "disgusting" and "wrong". I was a reverse version of this, and I had to inspect my sexuality to ask myself why was it "unattractive" to sleep with women? Turns out it was internalized homophobia.

    ---------- Post added 27th Dec 2016 at 02:32 PM ----------

    *some

    ---------- Post added 27th Dec 2016 at 02:36 PM ----------

    Oh, it could also be possible that you're closer to the heterosexual side of bisexual but just have a thing for experimenting. I've heard that before too.
     
  3. cakepiecookie

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2015
    Messages:
    326
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Somewhere
    If it's split for you then it's split. You feel the way you feel. Attraction is nuanced and complex, and it bothers me when people say that XYZ can't be the case – it amounts to acting like they know better how other people feel than those people know themselves.

    Having said all of that, once you identify your identity that doesn't mean it's 100% set in stone and that you can never learn anything new about yourself. Just continue to explore and see what works for you. :slight_smile:
     
  4. Chip

    Board Member Admin Team Advisor Full Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Messages:
    16,559
    Likes Received:
    4,757
    Location:
    northern CA
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    There's no support anywhere in the research, among credible professionals, or anywhere else credible for the idea of a separation between romantic and sexual orientation. Even the mention of references to asexuals is completely without any scientific, psychological, or other credible foundation.

    Where things get complicated is when people start mixing what are in reality psychological issues (such as difficulty with, or fear of, emotional intimacy, or discomfort or fear of sexual intimacy) with sexual orientations. These are completely different things, but unfortunately, the Tumblr and other crowds have completely thrown scientific study out the window and mixed these two entirely different elements together into a mismash of unverifiable concepts that aren't even internally consistent.

    It's very common for people who are questioning their sexual orientation to have fears and concerns that challenge their ability to be close (emotionally or physically.) And additionally, a large number of people come from families of origin that are less than ideal; stressed, overworked, or emotionally unavailable parents, unsafe living environments, violence or fighting in the home, divorce/separation/unstable parental relationships, and all sorts of other factors. These, in turn, have a powerful effect on the growing child. So these issues get in the way of how we feel about, and connect with, others.

    And then, finally, you're correct that a large portion of the people who claim the split are likely in the bridge stage of processing the stages of loss (denial-anger-bargaining-grief-acceptance.) 5 years ago, they would have labeled themselves 'bisexual' (which is not to say that true bisexuals don't exist... they do...) but now the 'label du jour' is this homosexual/heteroromantic or vice-versa.

    So the bottom line is, at least according to the overwhelming amount of study that's been made over the past 40 years, there's no indication that this mythical split exists. People are welcomed to use any label they wish... but if you're asking for scientific basis or legitimacy of these labels... there isn't any.
     
  5. NYCer

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2016
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    New York
    Gender:
    Female
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Lesbian
    Out Status:
    Some people
    Thanks, everyone, for your quick replies.

    Yes, there is probably some cultural brainwashing, as, growing up, it never occurred to me that two women could be in a sexual/romantic relationship with one another. In high school, I remember thinking that the only way I could have sex with a woman in the future was either to fly to Las Vegas (where I heard prostitution was legal) or in a woman's prison (and I thought, wouldn't it be great if I had to go to prison for some reason), which seems a little funny looking back.

    As I've gone to some lesbian meetups the past couple of months, I have developed a couple of mini-crushes on women and actually felt myself being physiologically aroused while being near them and talking to a couple of women, which has never happened before, so maybe it's something I'm allowing a little bit, but I find it still hard to truly envision a true, romantic relationship between two women. Previously, my sexual fantasies were primarily of women I saw in porn magazines or videos, not women I knew personally in real life. My therapist actually said she thought I might be a sex addict because of my sexual objectification of women.

    I have recently been re-thinking my sexual orientation because lately my lesbian fantasies have seeped into my daily life, becoming perhaps almost obsessive, whereas before they were cabined to fantasies I had while masturbating before sleeping or when feeling stressed.

    If there is a divide between the romantic and the sexual, are your romantic feelings or your sexual feelings a more accurate indication of your true sexual orientation? I think when I fantasize about men, it's more that I fantasize about being this "perfect" couple, him taking care of me, him finding me irresistibly sexy and feeling loved and accepted by society. I get turned on by sex with men only to the extent that the man is turned on by me, as it gives me an ego boost to feel like a man finds me sexually attractive; otherwise, sex with guys doesn't interest me.

    Does it seems like I am lesbian? I definitely want to have a girlfriend and see how it goes; I'm not interested in dating men at this point, but I'm not sure if I'm just searching for some "cure" to my loneliness or my low self-esteem.

    Any additional thoughts appreciated. Thanks!
     
  6. Creativemind

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    Messages:
    3,281
    Likes Received:
    411
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Gender:
    Other
    Gender Pronoun:
    Other
    Sexual Orientation:
    Other
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    It definitely seems there could be some internalized homophobia there, especially given what you said about "not imagining it" in your past. This is further supported by you developing small crushes on them.

    It's likely you haven't gotten used to the idea since you've been fed the message that heterosexual love is superior your whole life.
     
  7. findingjoy

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2016
    Messages:
    552
    Likes Received:
    130
    Location:
    NYC
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    I am someone who has come out to myself as a gay man, and i could have written many of your thoughts.

    I had gay sex fantasies but dated women all my life, but when I finally came here and posted and started thinking about it, thinking that it was possible to be in a romantic relationship with a guy, my romantic fantasies became about men too. I also felt an incredible rush of positive emotion when I accepted to myself this could be possible.

    Almost every day I realized some way that I had repressed my feelings or was driven by societal pressure- even going back to high school 'who do you like'... you have to like someone, who do you think the hottest girl is?'

    Looking back I realized that my 'romantic' relationships or fantasies about women were exactly how you describe yours about men- being the perfect couple, being loved, the ego boost.

    Like you my fantasies were contained but since coming here it has seeped into everyday life and now am actively pursuing dating.
     
  8. NYCer

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2016
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    New York
    Gender:
    Female
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Lesbian
    Out Status:
    Some people
    Thank you, findingjoy.

    It's really only after doing some daily "self-parenting" and "inner child work" that my lesbian fantasies really seeped into my life during the day such that they were interfering with my work and I felt like I opened this Pandora's box that I couldn't control. I felt like I couldn't take it anymore and for some reason decided that having lesbian sex only in fantasies wasn't good enough anymore. I thought I would go crazy if I didn't have lesbian sex in real life or at least try dating women.

    The fact that this happened only in my 40s I think might be a sign of how strong my ego's desire was to feel accepted by my parents and by society and to be considered "successful" in the eyes of others, which I found a little horrifying. I actually find it a little strange that I intellectually know that sexual orientation is determined by who you are sexually attracted to and I was very conscious of the fact that I have always been very sexually attracted to women, but I really didn't think of myself as gay.
     
  9. bunnydee

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2016
    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Gender:
    Female
    Sexual Orientation:
    Lesbian
    You got me rofl with this :roflmao: I thought that so many times, it's funny to know someone else has too.

    I am in my 40's as well - 45 to be exact. I have known I was lesbian since a young teen and avoided it due to my own insecurities and upbringing. I am married to a man that is a dear friend and we have a child together. It has taken many years for me to get to accepting myself for me and loving myself no matter what other's beliefs are about it. I plan on staying married until my child is grown - another 6-7 years.

    I just wanted you to know everything you feel and said is normal. It is the process your mind goes through trying to get through what you were brought up to believe. Once you fully accept yourself, there will be no more doubt, no more separating romantic versus sexual. I knew it, I fought it, I hid it-still am hiding it. But the one person you should be honest with is yourself. Acceptance of yourself and your feelings brings happiness in yourself and everything gets better.

    ---------- Post added 28th Dec 2016 at 06:47 PM ----------

    @NYCer

    Can you post your quote about the prison on my wall? I absolutely loved it and I don't have enough posts to post it myself. Please :icon_bigg

    So much of what you said resonated with me. Even the
    It is a lot to work through, but you will get there.

    I wish you all the best in your journey.
     
  10. wrhinla

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2016
    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Gender:
    Male
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    I have to say that I find Chip's reply to be utter B.S. The very notion that there can be meaningful "scientific" study of this completely subjective phenomenon strikes me as ludicrous on its face. Beyond that, I feel that he makes this assertion with the same kind of bogus authority that not so long ago would have been invoked to categorize homosexuals as sick. Why bother with discussing our experiences if Dr. Chip can provide us with a "scientific" study that proves that what we are experiencing is just not real? Love, desire, affection, bonding—are we to understand that these are knowable and measurable, and that prevailing opinion is that they are all in complete alignment!?
     
  11. NYCer

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2016
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    New York
    Gender:
    Female
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Lesbian
    Out Status:
    Some people
    Thanks, Bunnydee.

    The only thing that ever held me back in thinking that I was gay is my lack of romantic feelings for women. In terms of pure sexual attraction and what makes me physically sexually aroused, I've always known that I was pretty much 99% lesbian, perhaps even 100%. I can't even look at straight porn; the sight of the naked guy sort of ruins it for me, but then I thought straight women don't like straight porn either, right? They aren't actually physically attracted to men, right?
     
  12. Creativemind

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    Messages:
    3,281
    Likes Received:
    411
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Gender:
    Other
    Gender Pronoun:
    Other
    Sexual Orientation:
    Other
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Most straight women don't like straight porn because a lot of it is misogynistic and violent. Some like guy on guy porn because hot guys to them. But some 100% lesbians also like guy on guy porn since It's less "fake" than lesbian porn.

    Porn isn't the best indicator of sexuality, though.
     
  13. Chip

    Board Member Admin Team Advisor Full Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Messages:
    16,559
    Likes Received:
    4,757
    Location:
    northern CA
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Ah, the "Well, I don't like or understand scientific study, so I'll just discard anything scientific" argument AND the ancient, tired, and completely ridiculous "well, homosexuality was once classed as a sickness" argument in one post. Impressive.

    So first, to answer your question, yes, we can absolutely evaluate love, bonding and affection, with a pretty high degree of retest validity and reliability. But since you believe that such things aren't measurable or quantifiable, I guess you're ready to dismiss the work of the hundreds of researchers, with thousands of studies in the past 40 years, using both good qualitative as well as quantitative methodologies, simply because you have no understanding of how social scientists are able to study these things. OK, if you're going to do that, let's go ahead and dismiss *every* psychological study, because nearly all of them look at these same factors, including emotions, connection, interaction, attraction, relationships, communication, and numerous other factors that are just as "subjective" as the topics you claim are immeasurable. Brilliant... we just tossed everything, including validation of homosexuality as not just "a choice."

    On to the tired "Well, homosexuality was once a disease" argument. This gets tiring, as I've posted about it probably a hundred times by now, but in the interest of attempting to educate the uneducated... here we go.

    Homosexuality wasn't really studied in any meaningful way prior to Kinsey's work in human sexuality in the 1940s. His work was largely isolated until Masters and Johnson (most notably, along with many others) began extending study of human sexuality in the late 1960s. It took very little time after that (~5-6 years) before the APA and most everybody else credible in the scientific community recognized that homosexuality wasn't a disease or disorder. Since the 1970s, there have been thousands of studies looking at pretty much every aspect of human connection, sexuality, interaction, attraction, arousal. If this alleged separation were there, it is pretty much inconceivable that it would not have shown up in the many innovative and creative methodologies used to look at how human beings connect and interact in emotionally and physically intimate ways.

    Additionally, human biology and genetics doesn't evolve in 10 years, or even 30 years... and this whole bogus claim about separation between romantic and sexual orientation has emerged in the past 10 years or so. So, *if* it existed, it would not be a new phenomena, and would have been identified in the many years of study.

    Don't like science? Then you can also look at the empirical and anecdotal findings by thousands of therapists, sexologists, counselors and others who work with various populations. Again, the overwhelming majority of it shows no support for this concept (except, as previously discussed, a new "bridge identity" during the bargaining phase of the coming out process.)

    Finally, as any person who is remotely competent with scientific study knows, it's impossible to prove a negative. Therefore, there are no studies saying, directly, that this separation doesn't exist, just as there are no studies proving that there aren't Martians currently living in North America. But we do have, literally, thousands of studies that look at connection, interaction, emotional intimacy, physical intimacy, and other factors that "romantic connection" are subdivided into and neither I nor anyone I know who works in or studies this field have ever seen any evidence for this separation.

    If people simply looked at and labeled so-called "romantic orientation" for what it is -- deep, emotionally intimate friendship -- then there'd be no argument. Friendship has been studied for decades (a lot longer than sexual interaction) and everything described as "romantic attraction" is consistent with emotionally intimate friendship. It's just disingenuous to try to claim it as something it is not.

    All of the above said... if people find benefit in choosing/using unrecognized labels, including labels that separate between romantic and sexual orientation, they are absolutely entitled to do so. Again, where I (and EC's guiding philosophy, which in this case, happen to align) draw the line is in how we present the information that people are making use of to make their choices. People have a right to know and understand that a given label or concept has no scientific basis, backing, or grounding. If, once they know that and understand it, they still believe it's the best fit for their needs... then by all means, it's their right to use that label.
     
  14. bunnydee

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2016
    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Gender:
    Female
    Sexual Orientation:
    Lesbian
    I don't like straight porn, but then I am not straight. Don't really like male/male porn either, doesn't turn me on. Girls most definitely, though. If I happen to watch a straight porn vid- guy/girl - I am watching the girl and fantasizing it is me instead of guy, but I'd rather watch Orange is the new Black than straight porn...lol really not much on porn at all, I like to fantasize/dream.

    Yes, straight women are actually attracted to physically and sexually and romantically to men.

    ---------- Post added 29th Dec 2016 at 02:14 PM ----------

    oh.. Thanks NYCer for posting on my wall. I love that!
     
  15. NYCer

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2016
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    New York
    Gender:
    Female
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Lesbian
    Out Status:
    Some people
    Thanks, bunnydee!

    Actually, I have to say that I find male-male porn sort of disgusting and difficult to watch for some reason (no offense to any gay men out there!).

    I've stopped looking at lesbian porn a few weeks ago and masturbate either to lesbian women I've met or images I remember from the porn.

    I've read a description of Chip's masturbation test, but I guess I haven't officially taken it because I have no desire to masturbate to any thoughts of men or heterosexual sex. I think the last time I actually fantasized about having sex with a guy was in 2011 (my boss after a late night of working with him). Since I have fantasized about guys in the past, perhaps I'm at least a little bi? Not sure.
     
  16. bunnydee

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2016
    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Gender:
    Female
    Sexual Orientation:
    Lesbian
    was it a fantasy or dream? Makes a difference. Dreams can have sorts of meaning. You worked late into the night with him so he was on your mind when you went to bed - also could have several other reasons doing with work. Fantasy you consciously took the time to daydream about him. But either way I would say one time incident has no bearing on your sexuality.

    ---------- Post added 29th Dec 2016 at 03:54 PM ----------

    * all sorts of meaning.
     
  17. NYCer

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2016
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    New York
    Gender:
    Female
    Gender Pronoun:
    She
    Sexual Orientation:
    Lesbian
    Out Status:
    Some people
    It was a conscious/daydreaming type fantasy, like he found me so attractive that he lost self-control and had to have sex with me. I've had similar fantasies about guys before that and have had sex with guys, which is why I thought I wasn't gay. But in order to orgasm with a guy, I usually had to somehow imagine I was with a woman (like if he performed oral sex on me, I would imagine it was some woman) or look at lesbian porn (which guys didn't seem to mind too much).
     
  18. bunnydee

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2016
    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Gender:
    Female
    Sexual Orientation:
    Lesbian
    I can't tell you whether you or bi/lesbian/or straight. But, from what I have been told, and I have asked many straight women, women for the most part find it difficult to reach orgasm with a man. Oral stimulation, visualizations, or accessories seem to be the best option for guy/girl for the woman to orgasm unless the woman is hypersensitive. And most straight guys do not mind lesbian porn because it turns them on.

    You have to ask yourself some questions.
    Do you/did you truly find yourself sexually attracted to the men and just didn't receive satisfaction(orgasm) so you relied on what you knew worked(fantasies of women)?
    Or were there other reasons you were attracted to them?
    I'd say if the first then you could be bisexual.
     
  19. bunnydee

    Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2016
    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Gender:
    Female
    Sexual Orientation:
    Lesbian
    Let me start by saying - I agree with what you are saying on the theoretical premise.

    I differ in regards though to the premise that they cannot be separate. Physical/sexual attraction and romantic attraction are completely different and therefore can be separate. To say that they cannot be separate is to say no one can truly have a one night stand because obviously there was the sexual attraction so there should also be the romantic connection.

    When reading I took the question as a form of detachment as in Can someone have a sexual/physical attraction to one type and have a romantic attraction to a different type. The answer is yes. It is not a new issue. It has been around for ages. The 'bad boy' syndrome where the girl only has sexual attraction with the man who has the 'bad boy' reputation, but romantically marries the good guy even though she is not physically attracted to him. It exists. Even within LGBT - how many openly admit they connect or get along better with the opposite gender, but sexually are attracted to the same gender.

    I think it comes down to the perception of romance which for each person may be different. Surely even with your definition of romantic orientation being just a deep, emotionally intimate friendship, you can see that it is different/separate from a sexual attraction. Why then could it not be recognized as a separate orientation even at the smallest degree? Taking the examples I already used - why is one sexually oriented to the 'bad boy' but romantically to the 'good guy'? It goes to the perception of romance by the individual.
     
  20. beenthrdonetht

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2016
    Messages:
    1,315
    Likes Received:
    482
    Location:
    California
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Bisexual
    Out Status:
    A few people
    With all due respect to Chip -- which is a lot -- I seem to be an example (to myself) of heteroromantic bisexual. I knew I felt this way when I was 12. It was the same at 22. And at 32. And at 42. And still.

    One can nonetheless make the argument that I would also be biromantic if not for some deep-seated denial... but the long history, and my relatively trauma-free childhood, with loving and accepting parents, suggests that such an argument is itself a form of at least strained logic.